Home U.S. Coin Forum

Which $20 Saint would be your personal preference...

lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,160 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited March 13, 2024 9:19PM in U.S. Coin Forum

I think I've decided my preferences and if I don't win an auction between now and next week, I'll be looking around at the Baltimore show...

Given a price spread of +/- $150 between the two choices... they'd be roughly in the same ballpark...

Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.

Which $20 Saint would be your personal preference...

Sign in to vote!
This is a private poll: no-one will see what you voted for.

Comments

  • alaura22alaura22 Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Same boat as airplanenut,
    Type collector mostly
    Higher grade all the time

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,347 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Essentially just a generic coin. Keep as close to bullion value as possible.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 9,165 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Better the higher grade.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,446 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I voted for the higher grade common date as well, but would change my mind if the less common choice was a No Motto example.

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,233 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 18, 2024 4:03PM

    Attractive MS63-65 common date close to melt my preference. The bigger ticket coins I tread lightly - unless getting one for a client can tie up funds for a long time.

    Strong liquidity, Quick turnover / cash flow my goal.

    Coins & Currency
  • CopperindianCopperindian Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Less common MS63/64

    “The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

    PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
    Copperindian

    Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
    Copperindian

  • GoldFinger1969GoldFinger1969 Posts: 1,794 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Normally I would say go for the higher-graded Saint...but if you can find a nice MS-63, esp. in an OGH (like I did at FUN 2020), that could be worth a look.

    Only common I wouldn't want in MS-65 would be the 1908 NM. MS-66 CAC or higher, yeah, but not 65 unless you find one clearly undergraded.

  • divecchiadivecchia Posts: 6,639 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Like most other type collectors, common date higher grade for me.

    Donato

    Hobbyist & Collector (not an investor).
    Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set

    Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,321 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS 63 and, especially, MS 64 is a GOOD grade, if the piece is carefully chosen.

    I'd MUCH rather have a better date in one of those grades.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,341 ✭✭✭✭✭

    i would get the ms 65 and get some of the lower grade just to have both, fwiw

  • mirabelamirabela Posts: 5,021 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'd want the most attractive one I could get at a small numismatic premium over melt. Not so worried about the numerical grade, just an example with a look I really like.

    mirabela
  • goldengolden Posts: 9,616 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Higher grade.

  • VanHalenVanHalen Posts: 3,993 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If prices and relative quality of the piece are equal, I'd take a better date in 64 over a generic 65.

  • OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,008 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would take the common date over the lower mintage, but I'd make an exception for a 1933.

    My Adolph A. Weinman signature :)

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,991 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am primarily a type collector and would never collect this series as a set. Therefore I would go for the MS+65, but you need to be very picky. Not all MS-65 coins graded coins are the same.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Common date MS65

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file