Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1974 Mike Schmidt...

mintonlyplsmintonlypls Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited January 25, 2024 3:24PM in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

I just received word that this card bumped to a PSA-10! It will be in the Heritage March Auction...
BTW...it was a PWCC-E as a PSA-9.

mint_only_pls

Comments

  • jay0791jay0791 Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭✭

    Congrats
    beauty

    Collecting PSA... FB,BK,HK,and BB HOF RC sets
    1948-76 Topps FB Sets
    FB & BB HOF Player sets
    1948-1993 NY Yankee Team Sets
  • HidhoeHidhoe Posts: 309 ✭✭✭

    Congratulations!

    There are plenty more old 9’s that can bump also.

    Great job. Good luck.

  • hankcaddyhankcaddy Posts: 1,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow congrats

    currently collecting baseball of
    2004 spx
    1989 topps psa 10
    1959 phillies
    Phillies of the 70's
  • BBBrkrrBBBrkrr Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congratulations! That's a great bump. Beautiful.

  • BaltimoreYankeeBaltimoreYankee Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oh, my! Congrats on that fantastic Schmidt.

    Daniel
  • craig44craig44 Posts: 11,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    congratulations. that is fantastic news.

    George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.

  • brad31brad31 Posts: 2,783 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats and to think somebody might have paid current 9 prices for an old slab! Beautiful card.

  • mintonlyplsmintonlypls Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 25, 2024 1:44PM

    This 1968 Tom Seaver did not bump...purchased from Superior Sportscards at the1993 National in Chicago :

    And I'm waiting on these two (2):

    mint_only_pls
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,551 ✭✭✭✭✭

    YAHTZEE! WTG!

    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • BBBrkrrBBBrkrr Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think that's my favorite Perez card he ever had, and yours deserves a 10!

  • UFFDAHUFFDAH Posts: 1,986 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congratz Monte!! Beautiful card!!

  • KendallCatKendallCat Posts: 2,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice job - Monte. That is huge news!🎊🎉

  • olb31olb31 Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    can you share your cost to psa for this? and congrats. im a huge schmidt fan!!!

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • mintonlyplsmintonlypls Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 25, 2024 8:31PM

    Olb31

    I’m waiting to hear from Heritage Auctions who decided the four (4) cards were worthy of review since an employee of Heritage had previously worked as a grader at SGC. I have twenty-three (23) cards consigned to their current auction and…Heritage will probably take it out of my take. Bottom line….Heritage submitted the cards on my behalf.

    mint_only_pls
  • brad31brad31 Posts: 2,783 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 26, 2024 6:50AM

    My favorite Perez is ‘66 but that ‘67 is a short print as recently confirmed by the dedicated collectors on net54 who used miscuts to reassemble the ‘67 sheet Perez is on. If that one stays a 9 I am likely a bidder! If it is a 10 it will hit the stratosphere.

  • HidhoeHidhoe Posts: 309 ✭✭✭

    @mintonlypls said:
    Olb31

    I’m waiting to hear from Heritage Auctions who decided the four (4) cards were worthy of review since an employee of Heritage had previously worked as a grader at SGC. I have twenty-three (23) cards consigned to their current auction and…Heritage will probably take it out of my take. Bottom line….Heritage submitted the cards on my behalf.

    So it’s a win-win-win.
    Upon your approval they win with higher fees from higher sales prices .
    PSA wins with high review fees.
    You win with higher priced cards.
    Sounds like a good client to owner relationship. Everyone wins.

  • olb31olb31 Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mintonlypls said:
    Olb31

    I’m waiting to hear from Heritage Auctions who decided the four (4) cards were worthy of review since an employee of Heritage had previously worked as a grader at SGC. I have twenty-three (23) cards consigned to their current auction and…Heritage will probably take it out of my take. Bottom line….Heritage submitted the cards on my behalf.

    Interesting. I had no idea it worked that way. I've never consigned a card to an auction house.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • MantleFan23MantleFan23 Posts: 697 ✭✭✭✭

    Congrats Monte! All cards are super sharp!

  • RonSportscardsRonSportscards Posts: 942 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Hidhoe said:

    @mintonlypls said:
    Olb31

    I’m waiting to hear from Heritage Auctions who decided the four (4) cards were worthy of review since an employee of Heritage had previously worked as a grader at SGC. I have twenty-three (23) cards consigned to their current auction and…Heritage will probably take it out of my take. Bottom line….Heritage submitted the cards on my behalf.

    So it’s a win-win-win.
    Upon your approval they win with higher fees from higher sales prices .
    PSA wins with high review fees.
    You win with higher priced cards.
    Sounds like a good client to owner relationship. Everyone wins.

    And you also just described what could be viewed as a Good Ol Boys club.

  • sayheywyosayheywyo Posts: 499 ✭✭✭✭

    Congrats, pretty awesome. I have zero balls to even attempt a high grade review.

  • GansetttimeGansetttime Posts: 232 ✭✭✭

    Incredibly tough card, I had a PSA 9 that was slightly off centered, couldn't find an upgrade to improve on it.
    Congrats on the bump.

  • mintonlyplsmintonlypls Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 31, 2024 2:09PM

    Well...here's a disappointing update.

    Having watched the POP numbers on the four (4) cards in review...I thought that the Schmidt bumped since the POP for a PSA-10 increased by one and the POP for a Seaver PSA-9 went back to the old number for a PSA-9. Well...this afternoon (1/31), I checked the POP numbers and all four cards had the POP increase by one to the previous/old grade numbers, meaning no bumps! I am sorry that I jumped the gun! What are the odds that late last week on the same day (Thursday 1/25) the POP for a Schmidt PSA-10 increased by one and simultaneously the POP for a Seaver PSA-9 increased also by one?! Those are my cards, right---nope! Very disappointing...

    mint_only_pls
  • smallstockssmallstocks Posts: 1,631 ✭✭✭✭

    That truly sucks!


    Late 60's and early to mid 70's non-sports
  • BBBrkrrBBBrkrr Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Bummer.

  • RufussCkingstonRufussCkingston Posts: 1,642 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The extremely slight tilt was probably the killer!

  • mintonlyplsmintonlypls Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see what you're saying...a very, very subtle tilt.

    mint_only_pls
  • brad31brad31 Posts: 2,783 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sorry none bumped. That Perez would look great in my collection - could have your old ‘66 and ‘67! Am sure they will still get strong prices!

  • HidhoeHidhoe Posts: 309 ✭✭✭
    edited February 1, 2024 2:32AM

    Sad news.

  • craig44craig44 Posts: 11,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    ugh, sorry to hear. what would value be on a 74 Schmidt in PSA 10?

    George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.

  • mintonlyplsmintonlypls Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Last 3 sales of a PSA-10 1974 Schmidt: 16,000+, 43,000+ and 17,000+!

    mint_only_pls
  • BBBrkrrBBBrkrr Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mintonlypls said:
    Last 3 sales of a PSA-10 1974 Schmidt: 16,000+, 43,000+ and 17,000+!

    Yikes. Supper-bummer. That would have been the bump of the year.

  • olb31olb31 Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mintonlypls said:
    Last 3 sales of a PSA-10 1974 Schmidt: 16,000+, 43,000+ and 17,000+!

    those amounts, in the accounting world, would raise a red flag..too much of a difference/discrepancy sell prices. Maybe the 16K is closer correct.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • KendallCatKendallCat Posts: 2,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @olb31 said:

    @mintonlypls said:
    Last 3 sales of a PSA-10 1974 Schmidt: 16,000+, 43,000+ and 17,000+!

    those amounts, in the accounting world, would raise a red flag..too much of a difference/discrepancy sell prices. Maybe the 16K is closer correct.

    Guess when Goldin sold a Jordan PSA 10 rookie for $738k not once but twice in the same auction on the same day, and they were selling for $190-220k at the time with several for sale already that would maybe be a red flag as well 😉

  • HidhoeHidhoe Posts: 309 ✭✭✭

    @KendallCat said:

    @olb31 said:

    @mintonlypls said:
    Last 3 sales of a PSA-10 1974 Schmidt: 16,000+, 43,000+ and 17,000+!

    those amounts, in the accounting world, would raise a red flag..too much of a difference/discrepancy sell prices. Maybe the 16K is closer correct.

    Guess when Goldin sold a Jordan PSA 10 rookie for $738k not once but twice in the same auction on the same day, and they were selling for $190-220k at the time with several for sale already that would maybe be a red flag as well 😉

    It made Goldin customers raise their white flag and take their money elsewhere.

  • BrickBrick Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That 60 Gibson is a beauty.

    Collecting 1960 Topps Baseball in PSA 8
    http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/

    Ralph

Sign In or Register to comment.