GTG 1934 S WLH… Grade Reveal…
AlanSki
Posts: 1,926 ✭✭✭✭✭
2
AlanSki
Posts: 1,926 ✭✭✭✭✭
AlanSki
Posts: 1,926 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
65
Mr_Spud
Technically I see a 65 but that tone is a negative in the eye appeal department so I'll say 64.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
I see something on Miss Liberty’s jaw and neck area. I’m not at all sure what that is so I can’t grade it.
63
64 nice strike
64
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
65
My YouTube Channel
I'd say 65. I don't mind the toning personally.
64
Philippians 4:4-7
MS64.
Coin Photographer.
64
64
My first thought was MS-64, but I'll guess MS-63.
I'll go with ms64.
63
65, but she won’t win any beauty contests.
Toning looks intentional to draw away from strike and marks... not aure original.
Not a good strike
Au58
Playing in the opposite….The gouges above IGWT keep it at a 63 to me, but guessing NGC was more forgiving and gave it a 64.
64 with some well placed nicks & ticks.
Click on this link to see my ebay listings.
64
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
64+
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
You always have to question toning, is it veiling underlying surface blemishes? If it were taken off how would it grade? Probably no better than MS63.