Home U.S. Coin Forum

What is this error on my 1958 Type B Reverse Quarter? Planchet error? E over T? Obverse side.

I found this searching through mixed date roll of Type B Reverse quarters. It's very proof like, but what's going on with the E?

It almost looks like an E over a T on the microscope, and I also found many 1958 Type B quarters with heavy die polish on the obverse, which makes me wonder if they were polishing this out... Or maybe more likely a planchet error?

Comments

  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,895 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like some type of lamination error.

  • maymay Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Agree with OAKSTAR, though the coin is cleaned, not proof-like.

    Type collector, mainly into Seated. -formerly Ownerofawheatiehorde. Good BST transactions with: mirabela, OKCC, MICHAELDIXON, Gerard

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,563 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It actually looks like damage in the one photo with the metal moved due to contact damage with a sharp object. Need a better photo.

  • @OAKSTAR said:
    Looks like some type of lamination error.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It actually looks like damage in the one photo with the metal moved due to contact damage with a sharp object. Need a better photo.

    Here's a video: https://imgur.com/9PFZEzi

    And an additional picture.

    @Ownerofawheatiehorde said:
    Agree with OAKSTAR, though the coin is cleaned, not proof-like.

    I think the lines are just heavy die polish, similar to these.

  • maymay Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 3, 2023 4:09PM

    :trollface:

    Type collector, mainly into Seated. -formerly Ownerofawheatiehorde. Good BST transactions with: mirabela, OKCC, MICHAELDIXON, Gerard

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,721 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Ownerofawheatiehorde said:
    Thanks for the better photos, the first one made the coin look polished. It is clearly not.

    The second set of full coin photos is of a different coin than in the op. ;)

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • TurtleCatTurtleCat Posts: 4,628 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with lamination.

  • maymay Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coinbuf said:

    @Ownerofawheatiehorde said:
    Thanks for the better photos, the first one made the coin look polished. It is clearly not.

    The second set of full coin photos is of a different coin than in the op. ;)

    Oh well, I guess my original opinion stands true. :D

    Type collector, mainly into Seated. -formerly Ownerofawheatiehorde. Good BST transactions with: mirabela, OKCC, MICHAELDIXON, Gerard

  • Maxvan1Maxvan1 Posts: 36
    edited October 3, 2023 8:01PM

    The second set of full coin photos is of a different coin than in the op. ;)

    Oh well, I guess my original opinion stands true. :D

    How can you tell it's polished? I'm new to collecting. I wouldn't have thought that until you mentioned it.

    I posted the other two because I thought you may have been seeing the heavy polish lines from the mint (as shown on those other two)... Here's another picture the first one I posted. I've dipped it in acetone since.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file