Coins that came back HIGHER ~ official thread ~
![asheland](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/Lion319287571.jpg)
Post a coin that you sent off to the grading service, here or ATS that came back higher. Share what you thought it would grade and then show the slab.
This should be a fun thread!
I sent this last year, I expected MS 64:
20
Comments
I also expected this to grade MS64, NGC said MS65. Now also wearing a green bean.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Was not sure if it would even grade because of the obverse.
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/qk/my8s3nkhnagt.jpg)
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/9k/mdf6pdjd5lrh.jpg)
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/ic/0lrunfoyhi3n.jpg)
.
I thought this coin might be EF-AU from the seller's eBay pictures, then AU58 with a shot at MS when I saw it in hand. It turned out to be an MS63 purchased for less than a P01 price, one of my best "eBay victories."
Admittedly, grading 455-year-old hammered coins in modest circulated grades is challenging, but I was pretty sure this would be Fine-12 or 15, based upon the seller's photos (below) and comparing it to my 1567 that is a PCGS F12.
Instead, it came back quite a bit higher:
I bought this in a PCGS OGH 62. I resubmitted and it came back MS63. It now has a gold CAC. Not the best pics!
Cherry Picked this a few years back on eBay in a unattributed PCGS PR 66 holder for $38. I knew it was Re Engraved Die FS- 401. Once in my hand I saw it looked really nice for a PR 66 but I cracked it out as I had a bunch of other Variety coins I was submitting and figured what the heck, I will just send it in raw as I was confident it would come back at least a 66, maybe even 67. Evidently the graders felt it look really nice the 2nd time also.
Bought this raw in an auction in 1989. Was advertised as EF-40. I graded it a 58/62. NGC thought it was a 58- that was 1990.For $180. I’m quite happy.![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/tg/olsue4tudomm.jpeg)
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/k1/i5nbcpmgecz5.jpeg)
I thought this was an MS 65 due to ticks on obverse, came back higher grade.
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/fk/2obi98q2cava.png)
Commems and Early Type
This coin was in an MS-66 holder but I thought it was nicer than that so I sent it back for regrading hoping it would get a 66+ and it came back MS-67.
Here is my Washington Quarter Variety Registry Set
This is my Washington Quarter Proof Variety Registry Set
🤷♂️🤷♂️
Bought this No Motto thinking it looked nicer than the average 63. I think it was only the second gold coin I'd ever bought.
It was the first coin I ever crossed over to PCGS. I thought it'd come back 63; never imagined it would be bumped an entire grade.
It was also the first coin I ever submitted to CAC, thinking "there's no way in hell they would sticker this as a 64." I have yet to repeat this feat, and probably never will. The dangers of peaking too early!
Purchased raw at a Baltimore show circa 2011-2012, submitted at show thinking it was a gorgeous AU-55. Came back at AU-58. Submitted to CAC… and they agreed.
I've never had a US coin upgrade, but I bought this one raw as a mid-AU and was pleasantly surprised when it graded MS.
If CAC gave this coin a green bean in the PCGS MS64 slab, shouldn't CAC have given this coin a gold bean when it was in the NGC MS63 slab?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Great coins and stories! Keep them coming! 👍
My YouTube Channel
I was thinking the same thing. 🧐
I didn't know what to expect but it sure wasn't a 67.
I'm obviously not a grader. I was thinking 65 HOPING for 66.
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
this was an ANACS MS66 crossover to PCGS MS67, only 1 higher
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/du/l8pifr1tb6ub.png)
Expected F15 at best, came back XF40, seemingly because of a weak strike.
I'm BACK!!! Used to be Billet7 on the old forum.
This Barber was a gift from a family member. When they purchased it and gave it to me the dealer had advertised it as AU.![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/nu/ngyw65ovw3p6.jpeg)
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/0t/254hjvv4bqhb.jpeg)
When I bought this coin from a forum member it was graded AU-55. I thought it looked like MS-62, cracked it out and resubmitted it and it came back AU-58. It still looks like an MS-62 to me.
Cool idea for a thread!
This was my 1st crack out. The coin looked way better to me than F12 even with the green bean. I was hoping for a F15, maybe a VF20. Boy was I pleasantly surprised when I got it back.
Silverman68, jfoot13, GAB, ricman, Smittys, scrapman1077, RyGuy, Connecticoin, Meltdown, VikingDude, Peaceman, Patches and more.
I thought this 1794 cent would come back graded FR2. It came back G4. I clearly do not know 18th century copper![:) :)](https://forums.collectors.com/resources/emoji/smile.png)
Ok, one more….![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/by/1cg2i5jisr7b.jpeg)
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/md/z1zgrb5cbu12.jpeg)
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/l1/key0ope60nwd.jpeg)
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/ai/2mhioiqmjfr4.jpeg)
I picked this one up a a lcs….I soaked it in acetone to get some pvc off of it… it definitely not my series but I was thinking 64….. I’d never would have guessed 66! Or full steps!
Had a 1857 Flyer, P64, OGH - really hated to submit it since I loved the holder - came back PCGS 65 Cam - I got over the holder pretty quickly.![:D :D](https://forums.collectors.com/resources/emoji/lol.png)
Both of these came back higher than I expected…..but they made up for it on the large cents I submitted 😟
Great coins everybody!
My YouTube Channel
Hey, that’s my old coin! I bought it from Witter, and that one was an easy 64 imo. Reverse was more dinged up but all the hits were camouflaged in the eagles feathers. Sold it a few months ago
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
Not really graded higher than expected, but when I posted these as raw coins, the forum consensus was Genuine/Details. Since I was into the pair for about a $grand, figured it was worth submitting anyway:
That’s a really nice Eagle!
Perhaps I need to start buying from Dan!😂
I thought this would come back AU58 - Instead, MS63
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/56/x2yt6fpl9wgj.jpg)
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/as/g40piufe7trt.jpg)
.
.
Click on this link to see my ebay listings.
I was expecting AU55 to 58 when I sent this in. I was pleasantly surprised.
Here is another one, I sent it in raw expecting MS68:
My YouTube Channel
Not big but went from a PCGS MS 64 to MS 64+ (and received a TrueView)
Here is another half. I was thinking AU58 on this when I sent it in.
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/rr/mxf0409ihmvg.jpg)
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/cb/b758xnqi96lc.jpg)
I’m not sure this quite counts but I’ll tell the story anyway. I purchased this very rare Civil War token raw. It is the Virgil Brand collection coin and it is listed as 3 known (Though there are a few more than 3 known, but probably less than 12). Well, I sent it off to get graded by s reputable company. It came back first, AU details - altered surfaces. I was a little confused so I resubmitted it, not with question, just sent it with another new group. Came back 65PL*. Go figure.
From AU details to 65PL, wow - I bet that was a good day for you!
True was a good day, but cost was more in line with 65 than AU details haha! I can only chalk that up to some kind of mistake. No way that was a grader seeing it that way at the time. It is the plate coin in multiple books!