Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Why are U.S. Early Gold from the 1820s and early ‘30s So Rare?

2»

Comments

  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,524 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yes, the gold yields from the southern sources was way below expectations. The only positive thing about the Georgia gold was that it had high purity.

    Here are some Charlotte and Dahlonega mint coins.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 8,146 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BStrauss3 said:

    @logger7 said:
    The gold for the coins presumably was coming from the Reed gold mine near Charlotte and the later one near Dahlonega? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_Gold_Mine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Gold_Rush

    It's also obvious that the amount of gold produced in the US was TINY prior to the California Gold Rush.

    You can see all of this in the Mint Director's reports from the era (NNP https://nnp.wustl.edu/library/publisherdetail/51?Year=1834&displayAmt=50 , StL Fed has some posted).

    vs

    Virginia $1.1m over 25 years
    North Carolina, $4.1m over 25 years
    Georgia, $2.3m over 25 years

    California $5.5m in 2 years

    Very impressive numbers. It seemed that the industrial revolution coincided with the gold rushes those others are much more competent here analyzing the waves of precious metals mining. I recall that a Massachusetts governor recovered quite a bit of gold just tilling his fields in the 1600s.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file