The grading drama I went threw has nothing to do with this site and was strictly a pcgs show issue, so I'm not blaming anyone here for that and just happened to vent here.
Ok I cheated and happened to read a few sentences, I know for a fact ricko and aspie amongst others had nothing to do with this or coin facts, the list is huge who did nothing, well yes and by nothing means nothing was opposed to either, just I like you guys and gals
I also know Google bots or spiders go nuts on my posts, this doesn't make me better than anyone, just means they can't get enough and why would we want to stop it views and people in the site is what we all want I thought
To the experts and yes you are all still experts just like when I said I think we all are just in our own ways, none of this is meant to discredit anyone or their books.
To the ones I was actively talking with like today, none of what I'm saying is a slam at you also
I think the industry needs a backbone and ones who will say what is wrong or right regardless the control the industry is under and well it should be free like a bald eagle
One way to get one's post count up I guess! Like others have mentioned though I too have no idea what is going on with this thread. I thought I did for a moment but then it drifted away.
@SlickCoins said:
Would've been a nice thing I was informed that walkthrough services were not available
Hey Slick, welcome back. So I guess I’m trying to follow this, but are you saying somewhere mixed in the gibberish that your research has indicated to you that your consensus (and quite clearly) modern copy of a 1793 large cent is somehow tied to authentic 1795 cents? I’m trying to decode your messages for some reason!
Anyway, how reliable do you think your research has been on the 1793, with all the opinions and facts you have freely gotten from literally hundreds of responders over a half dozen forums?
It’s pretty hard for me to see how you are convincing yourself when your apparent research on if PCGS was doing on-site grading at a specific show you attended was incorrect, and seemingly you would like to blame others for this research oversight on your part. I mean, that’s pretty easy research to get right isn’t it?
New England Rarities...Dealer In Colonial Coinage and Americana
@NewEnglandRarities said:
It’s pretty hard for me to see how you are convincing yourself when your apparent research on if PCGS was doing on-site grading at a specific show you attended was incorrect, and seemingly you would like to blame others for this research oversight on your part. I mean, that’s pretty easy research to get right isn’t it?
Why would you want to try and confuse the poor guy with logic and facts?
@ricko said:
Well now.... Not sure what contributed to this situation... Must have missed it all. Cheers, RickO
Same here and this is as far as I go on this topic, got enough drama.and it's tiring.
Off to the next topic to see what's new and if I can learn anything .
After approval here's my sign right, you all are allowed to jump everything about me and I post coins to back me up and I get the pending approval like I'm some kind of bad guy
I'd be more than honored to show you all my research on the coin you all have never held in hand.
Just be prepared for like a wine that is aging and getting better, so am i
Thanks
I'd really like to do it in person and show you all that I'm right and another is also right of course with his approval.
I'm still shocked you all are getting away with cancelling an engraver all together
Yes I think about who gets the last laugh 😂 just so far everyone one I show all these coins to has never backed your side even after I explain to them everything.
So trust me the number of people I've shown far outweigh my posts edit( I mean on the 1793),I do show them everything else and sometimes they don't see the faces along with shoot sometimes the coins a mirror finish like the 1793 that you've almost have to be ninja kidding but not really
I'll clarify my thread, see all my posts have been deleted but to a super tech and thinker of outside the box, the reactions are links to my posts, imagine that right.
So I proceeded to vent about being deleted and bringing up the reactions to find the 1958 D with the S in the middle has been reduced big time, if I'm so wrong why reduce a picture that I've already reduced?
I wonder if the pics that are pending approval, if the powers are going to reduce them also, I mean I get it kinda for I'm like a stickler and nobody likes that for in the end I'll have all my ducks in a row also keep in mind my threads get the most views of any or did so on ngc, if I'm so wrong where are all these people's voice to rain down upon me?
I straight up challenge the counterfeit experts for I am ready, just they all say they don't have to cause it's fake, ummm ok Roger, for that was also his answer you know the one who is changing history on how coins were made back then
@SlickCoins said:
I straight up challenge the counterfeit experts for I am ready, just they all say they don't have to cause it's fake, ummm ok Roger, for that was also his answer you know the one who is changing history on how coins were made back then
Or I liked how one said I'm a real mean guy and that's why nobody takes me seriously lol for what bringing fourth what I and others have been sitting on because someone decided they know how it came from the actual mine,, hmmm during a true copper shortage is he sure it didn't have to travel on a boat after the mine?
I mean sounds super easy for a new founded country, in fact I wonder how many copper mines we had back in 1793.
I'm just surprised the US mint would allow the one who built the mint to be erased from history all together as the true first engraver.
Ok I just read that someone said do the research on grading levels allowed, mind you this was last year, Steve Feltner said "get the same grading quality as walkthrough at the same cost" well that must've changed, just no I can read people and went against myself in person, for I sense the shady body language, then was told I got it and then told it was unavailable
@SlickCoins said:
I straight up challenge the counterfeit experts for I am ready, just they all say they don't have to cause it's fake, ummm ok Roger, for that was also his answer you know the one who is changing history on how coins were made back then
Could we please see a picture of the 1793
It's in his other thread on the 1793 cent. It's a modern copy.
I mean picture of supposed said sight unseen copy/counterfeit/token, well and like I said I keep getting better and new toys aka cell phone camera.
Thanks all
The pics I was pending approval on is, well slick bragged about a 1977 LMC hmm I wonder if it was cause all the S marks on it and I've got a 1964 quarter same S trend except I'm pretty sure the S mark is viable under the D mark
Comments
The grading drama I went threw has nothing to do with this site and was strictly a pcgs show issue, so I'm not blaming anyone here for that and just happened to vent here.
I'm not better than anyone but I'll be damned if I do any of the above
Would've been a nice thing I was informed that walkthrough services were not available
Anyways in famous Slick fashion 80 posts later
have a great evening or for some have a great morning 
Thanks all
Ok I cheated and happened to read a few sentences, I know for a fact ricko and aspie amongst others had nothing to do with this or coin facts, the list is huge who did nothing, well yes and by nothing means nothing was opposed to either, just I like you guys and gals
My biggest question, is who puts one in charge to cancel anyone?
I also know Google bots or spiders go nuts on my posts, this doesn't make me better than anyone, just means they can't get enough and why would we want to stop it
views and people in the site is what we all want I thought 
To the experts and yes you are all still experts just like when I said I think we all are just in our own ways, none of this is meant to discredit anyone or their books.
To the ones I was actively talking with like today, none of what I'm saying is a slam at you also
Everyone here including pcgs and the forums no slam intended, just we need a new site not being controlled, that's what I should've said
I think the industry needs a backbone and ones who will say what is wrong or right regardless the control the industry is under and well it should be free like a bald eagle
Got a new Asus ROG 7 Ultimate super sweet gaming nerd phone and well after my vent earlier I found this so and well it is a coin forum
One way to get one's post count up I guess! Like others have mentioned though I too have no idea what is going on with this thread. I thought I did for a moment but then it drifted away.
K
I'm putting this all in a book and calling it "One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest. Sound like a good idea?
hells yes
This is my guy 👍
Hey Slick, welcome back. So I guess I’m trying to follow this, but are you saying somewhere mixed in the gibberish that your research has indicated to you that your consensus (and quite clearly) modern copy of a 1793 large cent is somehow tied to authentic 1795 cents? I’m trying to decode your messages for some reason!
Anyway, how reliable do you think your research has been on the 1793, with all the opinions and facts you have freely gotten from literally hundreds of responders over a half dozen forums?
It’s pretty hard for me to see how you are convincing yourself when your apparent research on if PCGS was doing on-site grading at a specific show you attended was incorrect, and seemingly you would like to blame others for this research oversight on your part. I mean, that’s pretty easy research to get right isn’t it?
Holy cow
US and British coin collector, and creator of The Ultimate Chuck E. Cheese's and Showbiz Pizza Place Token & Ticket Guide
Mike
My Indians
Danco Set
Why would you want to try and confuse the poor guy with logic and facts?
Slick, You have blown a head gasket and are loosing fluids everywhere, pull over and stop before you throw a rod threw the block.
I would love to hear from the folks working the PCGS submission table.
The show was over hours ago and they are still laughing.
Acronym of the day.
EDGATWTTTF
this thread makes me feel better about my own mental health
let's keep it rolling
Damn, I think my IQ just dropped 10 point after reading Slick's ramblings.
It's kind of like someone telling you "don't look into the light" but you do it anyways. And you regret it!
Ooooouuch, my head hurts!
USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
My current Registry sets:
✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)
His threads do tend to have that effect on people.
Smells like kamikaze.
Dude, I’m the one who should be pissed about getting banned. You make yourself a spectacle.
El loco, Picasso, 1904
this is about your 15th post, and there is nary a hint of a complete sentence, nor one that is literate
BHNC #203
Same here and this is as far as I go on this topic, got enough drama.and it's tiring.
Off to the next topic to see what's new and if I can learn anything .
After approval
here's my sign right, you all are allowed to jump everything about me and I post coins to back me up and I get the pending approval like I'm some kind of bad guy
How is this drama for you all I don't see you being cancelled? Or blocked
I'd be more than honored to show you all my research on the coin you all have never held in hand.
Just be prepared for like a wine that is aging and getting better, so am i
Thanks
I'd really like to do it in person and show you all that I'm right and another is also right of course with his approval.
I'm still shocked you all are getting away with cancelling an engraver all together
Yes I think about who gets the last laugh 😂 just so far everyone one I show all these coins to has never backed your side even after I explain to them everything.
kidding but not really
So trust me the number of people I've shown far outweigh my posts edit( I mean on the 1793),I do show them everything else and sometimes they don't see the faces along with shoot sometimes the coins a mirror finish like the 1793 that you've almost have to be ninja
I'll clarify my thread, see all my posts have been deleted but to a super tech and thinker of outside the box, the reactions are links to my posts, imagine that right.
So I proceeded to vent about being deleted and bringing up the reactions to find the 1958 D with the S in the middle has been reduced big time, if I'm so wrong why reduce a picture that I've already reduced?
I wonder if the pics that are pending approval, if the powers are going to reduce them also, I mean I get it kinda for I'm like a stickler and nobody likes that for in the end I'll have all my ducks in a row also keep in mind my threads get the most views of any or did so on ngc, if I'm so wrong where are all these people's voice to rain down upon me?
I straight up challenge the counterfeit experts for I am ready, just they all say they don't have to cause it's fake, ummm ok Roger, for that was also his answer you know the one who is changing history on how coins were made back then
Could we please see a picture of the 1793
Or I liked how one said I'm a real mean guy and that's why nobody takes me seriously lol for what bringing fourth what I and others have been sitting on because someone decided they know how it came from the actual mine,, hmmm during a true copper shortage is he sure it didn't have to travel on a boat after the mine?
I mean sounds super easy for a new founded country, in fact I wonder how many copper mines we had back in 1793.
I'm just surprised the US mint would allow the one who built the mint to be erased from history all together as the true first engraver.
Ok I just read that someone said do the research on grading levels allowed, mind you this was last year, Steve Feltner said "get the same grading quality as walkthrough at the same cost" well that must've changed, just no I can read people and went against myself in person, for I sense the shady body language, then was told I got it and then told it was unavailable
"What defines an expert?" This is complete and literate.
It's in his other thread on the 1793 cent. It's a modern copy.
I've got awesome answers for anything you might have for me
Sweet no updated pics, I'd rather not go for quadruple approval.
Thanks all for we have answered the "why" it is needed
Carry on and have a great day
That's a cute pug dog Fraz
Don't sweat my 1793 it ain't going away and will be published soon enough and I'll send a link
Everyone keeps reducing/shrinking it and or deleting it LMAO nobody has a good copy anymore
I mean picture of supposed said sight unseen copy/counterfeit/token, well and like I said I keep getting better and new toys aka cell phone camera.
Thanks all
The pics I was pending approval on is, well slick bragged about a 1977 LMC hmm I wonder if it was cause all the S marks on it and I've got a 1964 quarter same S trend except I'm pretty sure the S mark is viable under the D mark
Just like the supposed fake 1909 that was posted awhile ago, I hope that person kept it