Home U.S. Coin Forum

What say you? Asking for a friend

AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,801 ✭✭✭✭✭

Real or Not:

Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com

Comments

  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Going with my gut ... something looks off, but I can't place it


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What does it weigh? It could just be the images, but the surfaces look dull to me and the spots don't help either...

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 26, 2023 5:32PM

    Bad- The mm is wrong, and the placement of the mm is off.

    Coinfacts

    OP

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,801 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Don't know the weight as I don't have it in hand and the owner does not have a scale to weigh it. Says it's not magnetic is all I can add.

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • FloridafacelifterFloridafacelifter Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Doesn’t look right

  • HigashiyamaHigashiyama Posts: 2,198 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks mushy; even the bag marks don’t look right

    Higashiyama
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,457 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 26, 2023 5:41PM

    I’m noticing some irregularities.

    Among them the stars on the obverse don’t look right.

    My senses tell me not genuine.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • mikee999mikee999 Posts: 619 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 26, 2023 5:43PM

    un genuine at first glance having owned several high grade 79-CC including three in GSA Holders from a (a unique buying experience).

    looks like a made in China coin (Alibaba, Temu etc)

  • TrampTramp Posts: 704 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If pics are good representation then I'm going with fake. IMO the fields are just too smooth little chatter and then the crisp letter edging while considerable wear on eagle's breast and Liberty's hair. Along with the dullness that others have points out.

    USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
    My current Registry sets:
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
    ✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)

  • mikee999mikee999 Posts: 619 ✭✭✭✭✭

    my 79-CC for comparison


  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,900 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,801 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Owner got the message.... thanks all.
    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Higashiyama said:
    Looks mushy; even the bag marks don’t look right

    Good observation. On a real coin, the bag marks are usually shiny compared to the texture of the surrounding surfaces. When a fake coin is made by dies created using a real coin having bag marks, the bag marks on the counterfeit coin have a similar texture as the surrounding surfaces.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • JJMJJM Posts: 8,040 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MM looks off
    Fake

    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly
  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Unfortunately will probably fool a lot of new collectors. What I noticed is Liberty's cap looked very worn & mushy when the coin had AU details. Good info above related bagmarks.

  • HillbillyCollectorHillbillyCollector Posts: 640 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:

    @Higashiyama said:
    Looks mushy; even the bag marks don’t look right

    Good observation. On a real coin, the bag marks are usually shiny compared to the texture of the surrounding surfaces. When a fake coin is made by dies created using a real coin having bag marks, the bag marks on the counterfeit coin have a similar texture as the surrounding surfaces.

    Excellent observation and I hadn’t given this a thought.
    Learned something today!👍

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,801 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Seller ended the listing and took a hammer to it and tossed.
    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file