a 1933-S WLH GTG, it’s a grade that is not often seen or posted;
mikee999
Posts: 619 ✭✭✭✭✭
5
Comments
63
The grade makes sense, I had it as a lock 64, shot 65 (NGC). I guess they felt the same way Lol!
Nice coin, with a “typical” (sharp) strike for this date.
My guess was 64, did not expect a +.... Cheers, RickO
Would have said 64.
I knew it had to be MS.
I would have said 63 shot at 64.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
did you think it was a + coin & how often have you seen a coin graded 64+?
Wow, sorry to be late. I would have guessed 64, so no prize there. lol
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
but would you have given it a + grade?
Probably not, not that proficient at grading MS silver.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
It never occurred to me that it was a + coin.
Not very often seen in the Early Walker run of coins.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Nice walker for sure👍
Reed mark holding it back from full gem? Otherwise it's 65 or better.