Home U.S. Coin Forum

*PCGS cross results* “Grade revealed-help” GTG 1922 no d Lincoln cent

PppPpp Posts: 513 ✭✭✭✭
edited August 16, 2023 3:29AM in U.S. Coin Forum

Curious what people on this forum thinks of this coin.

————————
Updated with crossover results august 16, 2023

PCGS crossed the coin at vf30.
Granted many guesses, on this forum, thought the coin could be graded higher than the Ngc vf25 and I am wondering if I shouldn’t have taken the advice given and cracked it out and submitted it. I know the grade on the Ngc holder should not have been an issue when PCGS was grading the coin but I can’t help to think possibly that human nature could be involved. Regardless, I am happy it graded higher.

Maybe someday I will ask PCGS to reconsider the grade.

Comments

  • TRTR Posts: 55 ✭✭✭

    Just a guess. VF35. Looks nice.

  • MartinMartin Posts: 999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m at vf35 also

    Martin

  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,683 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The reverse looks EF40.
    The obverse is so mushy on all 1922 no-D cents that the grading is based mostly on the reverse.
    So I think VF35, although EF40 is possible if the obverse is weighed significantly less than the reverse.

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,189 ✭✭✭✭✭

    XF45

    peacockcoins

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Strong reverse... I'll say XF45 too. Nice looking coin, great color.

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,358 ✭✭✭✭✭

    By the ANACS grading standards of 1979-1984 when I was there this is an EF-40 based strictly on the reverse, but nowadays the TPG’s are a bit over cautious and I would expect this to come back as a VF-35.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • 1Mike11Mike1 Posts: 4,416 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll guess 40 but I see what looks like scratches in the obverse fields. Possibly old cleaning.

    "May the silver waves that bear you heavenward be filled with love’s whisperings"

    "A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
  • jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 1,368 ✭✭✭✭✭

    VF 35 and strong reverse. Very nice looking.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My initial impression was (and remains) VF35.... Cheers, RickO

  • Batman23Batman23 Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    VF35

  • m4832m4832 Posts: 96 ✭✭✭

    @jfriedm56 said:
    VF 35 and strong reverse. Very nice looking.

    I agree.

  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:
    By the ANACS grading standards of 1979-1984 when I was there this is an EF-40 based strictly on the reverse, but nowadays the TPG’s are a bit over cautious and I would expect this to come back as a VF-35.

    I agree. There's not much reverse wear evident.

    I like XF-45, but yes, it'll probably go VF-35

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,595 ✭✭✭✭✭

    40

  • PppPpp Posts: 513 ✭✭✭✭

    Thank you everyone for your comments and guesses.

    I thought this coin was under graded by Ngc (vf25) thus, why I submitted this post.

    In hand I do not see any outline of the mint mark but when I took the picture for this post I see a very faint outline (weak d). I was glad to see no one commented on this so I assume it is a non-issue.

    All my other rare date Lincoln cents are PCGS except this coin. I prefer PCGS for copper coins because my friend just reconfirmed with PCGS that there is no time limit on grade (unlike Ngc’s ten year grade limit). Also, I was told if the grade does change in time PCGS will compensate based on their guides the difference between original vs. new grade (note, my friend asked to get this in writing). This is a major PCGS selling point and that is why I plan on doing something with this coin.

    Based on your replies I have some decisions to make and would appreciate your thoughts.

    -should I submit this coin to PCGS with minimum vf30 as a crossover? (Note, if it crosses I would keep it and if it didn’t I would sell it).
    -should I crack it out and send in raw to PCGS?
    -or should I sell it and buy a PCGS 1922 no d?

    What do you think is the best approach to take with this coin?

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,595 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I may crack it.

  • 1Mike11Mike1 Posts: 4,416 ✭✭✭✭✭

    crack it out

    "May the silver waves that bear you heavenward be filled with love’s whisperings"

    "A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    "Should I submit this coin to PCGS with minimum vf30 as a crossover? (Note, if it crosses I would keep it and if it didn’t I would sell it)".

    My opinion is the above.

    It really is a nice coin for the date, Mint, and Variety.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • alaura22alaura22 Posts: 3,289 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BuffaloIronTail said:
    "Should I submit this coin to PCGS with minimum vf30 as a crossover? (Note, if it crosses I would keep it and if it didn’t I would sell it)".

    My opinion is the above.

    It really is a nice coin for the date, Mint, and Variety.

    Pete

    This

  • TrampTramp Posts: 705 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Crossovers have been difficult. I'd crack it out and see what PCGS has to say. IMO it has a shot at EF40.

    Nice '22 no D. It's the only one I'm missing in MS for my entire Lincoln cent collection.

    USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
    My current Registry sets:
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
    ✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)

  • MartinMartin Posts: 999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m wondering why it’s in a 25 holder in the first place? Is there problems in front of Abe’s face?
    Martin

  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Martin said:
    I’m wondering why it’s in a 25 holder in the first place? Is there problems in front of Abe’s face?
    Martin

    Because of the terrible condition of the die on the obverse due to it becoming terminal eons ago, the 1922 Die 2 is graded by the reverse, which was recently changed and fresh.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • 124Spider124Spider Posts: 967 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 21, 2023 11:22AM

    FWIW, here's my PCGS-graded VF35 of the same issue. To my eye, my obverse is a bit better than yours, but your reverse is a bit better than mine. I would crack it out and resubmit it.


  • WaterSportWaterSport Posts: 6,840 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 21, 2023 4:30PM

    They got it wrong - crack it out and resubmit or send it in for reconsideration.

    WS

    Proud recipient of the coveted PCGS Forum "You Suck" Award Thursday July 19, 2007 11:33 PM and December 30th, 2011 at 8:50 PM.
  • PppPpp Posts: 513 ✭✭✭✭

    “I included this post on the original post”

    Updated with crossover results august 16, 2023

    PCGS crossed the coin at vf30.
    Granted many guesses, on this forum, thought the coin could be graded higher than the Ngc vf25 and I am wondering if I shouldn’t have taken the advice given and cracked it out and submitted it. I know the grade on the Ngc holder should not have been an issue when PCGS was grading the coin but I can’t help to think possibly that human nature could be involved. Regardless, I am happy it graded higher.

    Maybe someday I will ask PCGS to reconsider the grade.

  • TrampTramp Posts: 705 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is my XF45.

    Comparing the two there's more visible wear to the VF30 on both the obverse (Lincoln's hair, jacket, cheek and chin) and reverse (wheat stalks, lettering isn't quite as sharp). Your 22 is still a nice coin.

    USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
    My current Registry sets:
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
    ✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)

  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,907 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's a nice coin. If you crack and resubmit at least you won't have to worry about it being downgraded.

  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Question: Does the strength of the reverse mean the reverse on the coin when struck was much stronger than the obverse? I would think the wear on a coin would be pretty even in circulation. What accounts for the strength of the reverse?

    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,907 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @pmh1nic said:
    Question: Does the strength of the reverse mean the reverse on the coin when struck was much stronger than the obverse? I would think the wear on a coin would be pretty even in circulation. What accounts for the strength of the reverse?

    The reworked obverse die was paired with a brand new reverse die. That's why "die pair #2" is really the only true no "D" cent.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file