Home U.S. Coin Forum

GTG - Roosevelt Dime NGC Crackouts - - REVEALED!

ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 6,121 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited May 2, 2023 6:20PM in U.S. Coin Forum

I have another data point in the ongoing NGC vs PCGS discussion.
I picked up 3 cheap NGC dime slabs, cracked them out, submitted to PCGS, and I have the results. I'll divulge those later on below. I admit there could be selection bias here. The slabs were probably cheap for a reason so you can probably see where this is headed.

If you want to have some fun, GTGs before I post them...



Tagged:

Comments

  • Mr_SpudMr_Spud Posts: 5,329 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63, 65FB, 64

    Mr_Spud

  • dhikewhitneydhikewhitney Posts: 437 ✭✭✭

    64, 65, 65

  • gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,584 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 2, 2023 12:30PM

    65, 66FT,66FT edit FB for PCGS

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,214 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66, MS65FB, MS64FB.

    Coin Photographer.

  • ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 6,121 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 2, 2023 12:52PM

    Interesting. I'll still wait a few hours to post the PCGS grades. Here are the NGC grades:
    Anyone surprised?

  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,479 ✭✭✭✭✭

    WOW. Those are lofty grades.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What are the PCGS grades?

  • ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 6,121 ✭✭✭✭✭

    OK I guess it's time to reveal the PCGS grades:
    1954-D MS66
    1992-P MS66FB
    1998-D MS65FB

  • MartinMartin Posts: 963 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don’t know a out the clads but the 54 looked FB to me, more so than the 92

    Are they what you thought. Not sure I’d crack out the proof like

    Martin

  • ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 6,121 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 2, 2023 6:55PM

    @Martin said:
    I don’t know a out the clads but the 54 looked FB to me, more so than the 92

    Are they what you thought. Not sure I’d crack out the proof like

    I got them cheap so I don't care too much about the results financially but I'm disappointed. I expected 66FB on all 3. Disappointed about not getting FB on all of them. Hard for me to believe PCGS and NGC can't agree on the that at least. I expected to lose the PL designation. The 98 doesn't look 65 to me but I'm not the best at grading these.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well... Late to the game...(a lot of that lately)....but would have guessed the PCGS grades in the reverse - 65, 66, 66. Cheers, RickO

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,342 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Back to the "cheap slab" box? >:)

    All glory is fleeting.
  • TPRCTPRC Posts: 3,789 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Also late to the game, but I was 65, 66, 65, all FB.

    Tom

  • 1madman1madman Posts: 1,464 ✭✭✭✭✭

    How much value did you lose by sending them to pcgs?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file