Home U.S. Coin Forum

Morgan 1921 PL ?

TrampTramp Posts: 691 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited April 14, 2023 11:25AM in U.S. Coin Forum

In hand this 1921 has good mirrored fields but just not sure if it would (edit) qualify as PL.
Unfortunately it does have 3 noticable contact points; nose, chin and below the eye. Grading definitely would take a huge hit.

Should I disregard it's potential and throw it in with the rest of my 1921s?

USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
My current Registry sets:
✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)

Comments

  • 1madman1madman Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭✭✭

    From the little bit of reflectivity I see around the edge where your fingers are, it looks like it has a decent shot at PL. I would send it in.

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,485 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Mmmm, does have some PL aspects but lots of wear on cheek and looks to have been poorly dipped with residuals as well. IMHO I would not submit. Possibly consider ammonia soak and tamp with soft soaked Q-tips (no rub) and LIBERAL rinse with water and tamp dry with high nap white cotton towel (no rub).

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • dsessomdsessom Posts: 2,397 ✭✭✭✭✭

    To better judge the reflectivity of the fields, and contrast with the devices, try shooting from a slight angle, rather than straight on.

    Best regards,
    Dwayne F. Sessom
    Ebay ID: V-Nickel-Coins
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,623 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1madman said:
    From the little bit of reflectivity I see around the edge where your fingers are, it looks like it has a decent shot at PL. I would send it in.

    I wouldn’t. The coin appears to be AU. So even if it would otherwise be designated PL - and I’m not convinced it would - I don’t think it would qualify for the designation.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • TrampTramp Posts: 691 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dsessom said:
    To better judge the reflectivity of the fields, and contrast with the devices, try shooting from a slight angle, rather than straight on.

    With a slight angle as suggested. Maybe this helps a little?

    USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
    My current Registry sets:
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
    ✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)

  • DelawareDoonsDelawareDoons Posts: 3,413 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like a details coin to me.

    "It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."

  • dsessomdsessom Posts: 2,397 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Much better! The fields look PL to me, but there is no real contrast on the devices. If it were me, I'd send it in for grading.

    Best regards,
    Dwayne F. Sessom
    Ebay ID: V-Nickel-Coins
  • ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 6,259 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 14, 2023 9:33AM

    $40 to get it slabbed is a decent gamble. MS62PL best case result. Maybe DMPL, but those are rare and not possible to judge effectively via pictures.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would not send it in, the second set of photos make it look messed with, the first look AU. But if you don't mind donating the funds and like to gamble them sure.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,623 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 14, 2023 10:17AM

    @ProofCollection said:
    $40 to get it slabbed is a decent gamble. MS62PL best case result. Maybe DMPL, but those are rare and not possible to judge effectively via pictures.

    It would be a poor gamble, not a decent one. The coin looks AU, not Unc. and in the second set of images, it appears to have been cleaned (edited: or altered). Chances of it receiving a straight-grade and PL designation are at best, extremely remote.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Tom147Tom147 Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Definitely has some mirror to it, but what's your best guess on the grade ? Judging from the pictures absolute best case would be ms62. More likely au58. Would it be worth it.

  • psuman08psuman08 Posts: 331 ✭✭✭✭

    I'd save your money on this one.

  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,339 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My opinion is that the first set of images who an AU coin and the second set of images show a coin after treatment with something like jewelers rouge. However, I could absolutely be wrong, especially about the second set of images.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Joe_360Joe_360 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I personally think that this coin looks better then AU.

    1921 P Morgan Dollar from "America's love affair w/a Legendary Coin by Miles Standish:
    "This issue yields few examples with mirrors or cameos. In DMPL the coin is extremely scarce, with few attributed as such in any grade. Abrasions usually limit the eye appeal of known DMPL's. The coin fares better in PL, with few examples in Gem or above.

  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,381 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Could be the photo but agree when the design itself appears shiny that is usually a sign of cleaning. If it was unfortunate since otherwise looks like a nice 21P with a strong strike.

  • Joe_360Joe_360 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coastaljerseyguy
    Hi, correct me were I'm wrong, but when a coin is clean, don't you typically see some signs of dark spot around the stars and/or letters? Where the cleaner could not completely remove the dirt/grim.

  • Che_GrapesChe_Grapes Posts: 1,884 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Give it a good scrubbing with a hard brush…

  • TrampTramp Posts: 691 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Che_Grapes said:
    Give it a good scrubbing with a hard brush…

    I'll get right on it! Lol

    USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
    My current Registry sets:
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
    ✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Tramp... I would not recommend submitting that coin... I think it is likely AU and would not receive the PL designation. Appears to have been polished a bit. Cheers, RickO

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file