Home U.S. Coin Forum

GEM 1972-S Ike Dollar GTG!

braddickbraddick Posts: 24,189 ✭✭✭✭✭

I'll have the answer later tonight:

peacockcoins

Comments

  • gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,589 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,701 ✭✭✭✭✭

    These come nice but I think this one is MS-68 anyway.

    Tempus fugit.
  • mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,130 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The fact that there's a TV, I'll assume that maybe this is a recent return from our hosts?? Can't tell if I'm seeing a little something under "UNI" on the reverse, maybe a couple minor spots in the fields.

    I actually like the Ike dollar. I'm sure that puts me in the minority.

    MS68

    Mark

  • raysrays Posts: 2,410 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That’s a beautiful example, I guess MS67+

  • GrantuGrantu Posts: 188 ✭✭✭

    Solid 67

  • KAJ1KAJ1 Posts: 774 ✭✭✭

    68

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,462 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS68.

    Coin Photographer.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    69

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭✭✭

    68

    Collector, occasional seller

  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,513 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That's some booming luster!

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,189 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TomB said:
    That's some booming luster!

    Additional shots:

    peacockcoins

  • CocoinutCocoinut Posts: 2,512 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll say MS68. The photos just posted make it appear to have PL surfaces. Possible, but I've never seen any. If it is PL, you have a treasure.
    _

    Countdown to completion of my Mercury Set: 1 coin. My growing Lincoln Set: Finally completed!
  • U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 6,197 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks clean enough for a 68

  • DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,214 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS 67.

    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • TrampTramp Posts: 705 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've always liked the Ikes. Maybe I'm in the minority too. MS67.

    USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
    My current Registry sets:
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
    ✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)

  • JerseyBJerseyB Posts: 130 ✭✭✭

    I'll say 68+. Looks like it could get 69. Beautiful coin.

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67

  • bigmountainlionbigmountainlion Posts: 222 ✭✭✭

    68

  • TurboSnailTurboSnail Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67+

  • U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 6,197 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PQ+ for a 67....the only thing I see is what looks like some small area of haze (or a spot?) in the field to the right of Ike (and I'm not sure that impacts the grade much)

  • Mr_SpudMr_Spud Posts: 5,835 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I thought it would be 68

    Mr_Spud

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,189 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @U1chicago said:
    PQ+ for a 67....the only thing I see is what looks like some small area of haze (or a spot?) in the field to the right of Ike (and I'm not sure that impacts the grade much)

    I think it is a water spot.
    I liked this one enough to purchase it as although the MS67 grade- and even, to an extent, the MS68 is somewhat common, finding these with blazing cartwheel luster is a treat.

    peacockcoins

  • JerseyBJerseyB Posts: 130 ✭✭✭

    I was way off. That true view is misleading. I assumed a higher grade with that level of luster and I couldn't really see any marks on the coin

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Darn... Late to the GTG, but would have guessed it... Thought 67 when first viewed. Cheers, RickO

  • dsessomdsessom Posts: 2,427 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My initial thought was MS67 as well. THAT is a damned fine coin, sir! I do love Ikes!

    Best regards,
    Dwayne F. Sessom
    Ebay ID: V-Nickel-Coins
  • SPalladinoSPalladino Posts: 885 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice coin, @braddick !
    The finish and luster is uncharacteristic for a 1972-S silver business strike Ike.
    I might hypothesize that perhaps a proof planchet might have been mixed into the B.S. planchets?
    I have a similar uncharacteristic 1972-S b.s. Ike at PCGS for grading right now. I suspect that its reverse might have been struck by a proof die. The fields look more proof like than a b.s. and the earth still has frost. I cannot verify it, and I've only asked PCGS to grade it.

    Steve Palladino
    - Ike Group member
    - DIVa (Designated Ike Varieties) Project co-lead and attributor
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,701 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SPalladino said:
    Very nice coin, @braddick !
    The finish and luster is uncharacteristic for a 1972-S silver business strike Ike.
    I might hypothesize that perhaps a proof planchet might have been mixed into the B.S. planchets?
    I have a similar uncharacteristic 1972-S b.s. Ike at PCGS for grading right now. I suspect that its reverse might have been struck by a proof die. The fields look more proof like than a b.s. and the earth still has frost. I cannot verify it, and I've only asked PCGS to grade it.

    I have one as well.

    Mine is pretty clean but I don't remember anything else unusual.

    I was expecting a few posters to guess PR-67 or 68.

    I know these aren't common like this as I've poked around in quite a few '72 blue Ikes to find one.

    Tempus fugit.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file