Home U.S. Coin Forum

Are Hairlines like these always indicative of cleaning? Back up with more Pics.

Riley1955Riley1955 Posts: 136 ✭✭✭
edited March 7, 2023 10:16AM in U.S. Coin Forum

Tagged:

Comments

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,643 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No, it could be due to repeated contact through circulation.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • 2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 824 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not necessarily, but usually yes
    They can be caused by other factors, think friction on any slightly abrasive surface…

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,545 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Always is a bit too inclusive a word to be used here. Could have been slid across a bar. Usually may be more accurate.

  • Project NumismaticsProject Numismatics Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with the advice from @airplanenut above. I don’t see any patches of hairlines on this coin that would cause me any concern - but hairlines are hard to photograph. I check for hairlines by rotating the coin under a halogen light which is a harsh light source that tends to reveal every flaw. I’ve also seen coins with hairline patches straight grade - Peace dollars in particular.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,643 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    Incused Indian $5 and $2.5 gold coins do not have raised rims that would provide a degree of protection to the fields so these coin types should be expected to have more hairlines after being in circulation. The OP's coin looks typical for an AU coin of this type.

    @MapsOnFire, what caused you to click on “LOL” for the accurate and informative post quoted above?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Riley1955 can you post a picture of the reverse?

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • Riley1955Riley1955 Posts: 136 ✭✭✭

    Here's the reverse. And Thanks for the replies.

  • Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,198 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I do agree with the comments above however this coin looks lightly cleaned In my opinion.

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 5, 2023 8:15PM

    @Coin Finder said:
    I do agree with the comments above however this coin looks lightly cleaned In my opinion.

    +1. There’s a lot of parallel hairlines and the coin looks a bit too bright, yet it has dirt in the crevices of the feathers. I suppose I might be wrong but I’m leaning towards cleaned.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • Riley1955Riley1955 Posts: 136 ✭✭✭

    Thanks for the opinions. I'm going to try for better pictures tomorrow (still struggling in that area).

  • Project NumismaticsProject Numismatics Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Have to revise my opinion based on the reverse unfortunately. The reverse looks questionable to me, particularly from 7:00 to 11:00 in front of the eagle, particularly toward the rim. Try photographing under various lighting conditions and at different angles and maybe a few more folks can chime in.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Riley1955.... That gold coin looks to me to have handling/circulation hairlines, not cleaning. Friction rub is easily embedded on the soft gold, and there are no rims or raised devices on incuse coins to protect the fields. Cheers, RickO

  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,384 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Reverse does look lightly cleaned, but probably still MA. Very subjective topic in a lot of borderline cases, especially for what I call 'rough' circulation. Lots of folks use the term 'cleaned' when the coin deserves a details grade, but just was roughly handled, and not MA.

    For me, obvious cleaning usually involves straight, one-way hairlines on the coin from a wiping and usually vertical, as it is easier to move your thumb up and down vs sideways - try it. If the lines are all over, it may just be rough circulation, which I agree may not be MA.

    Another telltale sign to me is slightly left over toning, gunk, etc that the cleaning did not get all off, i.e. in the eagle's reverse above.

    Then there are the cleaning/wipe hairlines on very circulated coins, i.e. XF and lower. Usually the extra circulation fades out the rougher earlier circulation. AU coins, exp dollars, can have a lot of distracting circulation marks that look like cleaning when I'm not 100% sure. But if I see those hairlines on a VF, its a cleaning. JMHO.

  • Riley1955Riley1955 Posts: 136 ✭✭✭

    Here's some different pics without all my not so good editing. This has been a good learning experience for myself and I appreciate all of your replies. PS these are from my cell phone. I've seen others say they use this method a lot.

  • Riley1955Riley1955 Posts: 136 ✭✭✭

    ttt

  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,355 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The second image you posted was a little alarming, but given the additional images I still think the coin is just lightly circulated and does not show much in the evidence of being cleaned.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Bill, the most recent set of photos is a little too "digital" to ascertain grade with respect to surface preservation, I'm not sure if the photos are out of focus or if its a resolution issue, but they looks more like paintings. That being said, the lighting is not as harsh as it was in the op photos, and If they were the only photos you showed us I might not have guessed "cleaned".

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • Riley1955Riley1955 Posts: 136 ✭✭✭

    @TomB

    @DeplorableDan said:
    Bill, the most recent set of photos is a little too "digital" to ascertain grade with respect to surface preservation, I'm not sure if the photos are out of focus or if its a resolution issue, but they looks more like paintings. That being said, the lighting is not as harsh as it was in the op photos, and If they were the only photos you showed us I might not have guessed "cleaned".

    Ok, I think these are the best I currently have.

  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,384 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those photos look better. Cleaned or not, who knows for sure. If it was, lightly done. Still good shot at MA.

  • telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,914 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think it's been wiped a few times in its life but I wouldn't lose sleep over it. Possible ex-jewelry piece imo


    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,798 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There are certain lighting angles that will make almost any piece of circulated gold look like it has hairlines.

    Of course, you can have both random light scratches and a nasty patch of parallel lines. It's almost impossible to evaluate well in a photograph, but pretty easy to see in-hand. Random, multi-directional light scratches are to be expected. A nasty patch of deeper, parallel lines would be more of a problem.

  • Riley1955Riley1955 Posts: 136 ✭✭✭

    @coastaljerseyguy said:
    Those photos look better. Cleaned or not, who knows for sure. If it was, lightly done. Still good shot at MA.

    MA?

  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,384 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not the worse I've seen in a clean holder. Would need to see in hand.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,246 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Riley1955 said:

    @coastaljerseyguy said:
    Those photos look better. Cleaned or not, who knows for sure. If it was, lightly done. Still good shot at MA.

    MA?

    I'm guessing MA is Market Acceptable.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file