Home U.S. Coin Forum

1969-S Nickel Proof - Why the difference in two coins?

MizzouMizzou Posts: 529 ✭✭✭✭

I was going through a few old albums that I had in the closet and happened to notice the difference in detail in two 1969-S Proof coins. The difference is drastic. Is it because one of these might be out of a "Special Mint Set"?

Wisdom has been chasing you but, you've always been faster

Comments

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,201 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No such thing.

    Maybe die fatigue or polishing. There used to be much more variation than in the more modern period.

  • MizzouMizzou Posts: 529 ✭✭✭✭

    I'm not familiar with the series but, what a stunning difference in the detail.

    Wisdom has been chasing you but, you've always been faster

  • ifthevamzarockinifthevamzarockin Posts: 8,902 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Mizzou said:
    I'm not familiar with the series but, what a stunning difference in the detail.

    Modern proofs have much stronger frost than older proofs. ;)

  • MizzouMizzou Posts: 529 ✭✭✭✭

    @ifthevamzarockin said:
    One appears to be a 1969 the other a 1996

    That could explain the difference. ;)

    I looked again and you're right, a '69 and a '96 DOH! Apparently I got hosed when I bought that because the holder is marked '69.

    That being said, it's still a remarkable difference in detail.

    Wisdom has been chasing you but, you've always been faster

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yep... Different years...but a lot of difference in the two coins. Always look closely at purchases.
    ;) Cheers, RickO

  • MaywoodMaywood Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Between 1969 and 1996 the Mint probably re-worked the Jefferson Nickel design at least 5-10 times.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file