1837 Reiver LM-2 bust half dime - then and now
The LM-2 below is currently on GreatCollections. It's a tough die marriage, especially in higher grades, although the John Reich Collectors Society now calls it R4, down from its original R5 in the 1998 Logan-McCloskey book.
Images on the left are from the 1/27/2006 Reiver sale on Heritage. It was then in an NGC XF45 holder and sold for 862.50. Images on the right show the coin in its PCGS XF40 holder.
While I acknowledge that photos of the same coin can look very different depending on the photographer, lighting, etc. (and these certainly do) - I think this coin has changed.
Question to the world: was it changed for the better or to its detriment?
New website: Groovycoins.com Capped Bust Half Dime registry set: Bikergeek CBHD LM Set
1
Comments
Hard to make a judgement given how the pics are so very different. I know you acknowledge that, but I hesitate to state the coin is worse off today based upon these picture differences and the unknown look in hand.
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
@Catbert, I know - it's a conundrum! I had another post a few weeks back where I swore a coin had been dipped out, and someone here ran it thru some photo editing software and showed how the "cleaning" was in fact just a change in the photograph's parameters.
But in the earlier Heritage photos, it looks like Liberty is ready for some football!
New website: Groovycoins.com Capped Bust Half Dime registry set: Bikergeek CBHD LM Set
IMO NGC over graded a lot of coins in the Reiver Sale. I had a NGC MS61 Large Cent cross to PCGS AU58 and I fully expected that to happen. The coin had wear over the ear. I have noticed that GC photos bring out most of a coins marks. This is a good thing because there are no surprises when you get the coin in hand. As for this coin....I am not an expert but I think the GC picture is probably a more accurate representation of the coin than the HA photos. I don't think the coin visited a doctor.
The NGC Reiver coin I crossed to PCGS went down a grade too. For what it's worth I agreed with the PCGS grade of it more than I did the NGC grade.
I think it's just a difference in photography and lighting technique.
A lot of the crud thats visible on the lefthand photos is missing from the righthand photos. It also looks to have a bit less detail.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
>
I agree. I do not believe the coin has changed.
The images are drastically different however.
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242