1993D 1c

RobertLahti

The assumed broken die, if taking that direction, would be on the void of dual lines above, not on the sufficient remaining lower lines, what I see is the remaining doubled lower lines from the point the removal extends.

The right side, has the lower half showing the far right line is the lower, but at the top it is the highest because of the void with no die breakage.

RobertLahti

Strong extra columns are the sought after variety for the 1993 Lincoln Memorial Cent.

PeakRarities

@RobertLahti said:
The assumed broken die, if taking that direction, would be on the void of dual lines above, not on the sufficient remaining lower lines, what I see is the remaining doubled lower lines from the point the removal extends.

The right side, has the lower half showing the far right line is the lower, but at the top it is the highest because of the void with no die breakage.

Robert, I sincerely tried to process this group of words and I have failed, miserably.

Nice pictures though 👍

NeophyteNumismatist

Yeah... I almost hurt myself reading that.

ricko

Cheers, RickO

NeophyteNumismatist

@RobertLahti - I mean no disrespect here, but why do you do this on the forum? You take super close-up images of pocket change coins and do not adequately ask questions. You mix-up a lot of numismatic terms (and even coin a few yourself). Your posts are confusing and misguided; damaging your credibility.

I applaud you for looking at the coins you come into contact with. But with posts like this (especially tagged "nonsense", etc.) you are not going to get good results from the group. Maybe your intent is to do nothing but troll the room, and if that's the goal - you got it.

But, if you are really trying to become a good numismatist (as I am), I think this approach will not serve you well. Your current path leads to binders filled with common pocket-change/parking-lot coins and no numismatic mentors to take interest and help you.

New Year is about new beginnings... I would love to see you become a better numismatist in 2023. You need to change your approach to get there, but it is not too late.

Cheers and good luck.

OAKSTAR

@RobertLahti- It's just kinda rude not engaging and provide addition feedback to questions members are asking, when they are trying to help you... Don't you think?

I'm about ready to block this guy.

Pizzaman

@RobertLahti said:
The assumed broken die, if taking that direction, would be on the void of dual lines above, not on the sufficient remaining lower lines, what I see is the remaining doubled lower lines from the point the removal extends.

The right side, has the lower half showing the far right line is the lower, but at the top it is the highest because of the void with no die breakage.

Wow. I just joined here and I don't understand one thing you just said.

JBK

@Pizzaman said:

@RobertLahti said:
The assumed broken die, if taking that direction, would be on the void of dual lines above, not on the sufficient remaining lower lines, what I see is the remaining doubled lower lines from the point the removal extends.

The right side, has the lower half showing the far right line is the lower, but at the top it is the highest because of the void with no die breakage.

Wow. I just joined here and I don't understand one thing you just said.

That's a good thing.

spyglassdesign

@Pizzaman said:

@RobertLahti said:
The assumed broken die, if taking that direction, would be on the void of dual lines above, not on the sufficient remaining lower lines, what I see is the remaining doubled lower lines from the point the removal extends.

The right side, has the lower half showing the far right line is the lower, but at the top it is the highest because of the void with no die breakage.

Wow. I just joined here and I don't understand one thing you just said.

I'd be more worried if you did 😅