Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1993D 1c

The assumed broken die, if taking that direction, would be on the void of dual lines above, not on the sufficient remaining lower lines, what I see is the remaining doubled lower lines from the point the removal extends.

The right side, has the lower half showing the far right line is the lower, but at the top it is the highest because of the void with no die breakage.

We'll see...WHAT? What brought your attention...?

Comments

  • Options
    RobertLahtiRobertLahti Posts: 328 ✭✭✭

    Strong extra columns are the sought after variety for the 1993 Lincoln Memorial Cent.

    We'll see...WHAT? What brought your attention...?

  • Options
    NeophyteNumismatistNeophyteNumismatist Posts: 894 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yeah... I almost hurt myself reading that.

    I am a newer collector (started April 2020), and I primarily focus on U.S. Half Cents and Type Coins. Early copper is my favorite.

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 5,829 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RobertLahti- It's just kinda rude not engaging and provide addition feedback to questions members are asking, when they are trying to help you... Don't you think?

    I'm about ready to block this guy.

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • Options
    PizzamanPizzaman Posts: 226 ✭✭✭
    edited December 30, 2022 10:48AM

    @RobertLahti said:
    The assumed broken die, if taking that direction, would be on the void of dual lines above, not on the sufficient remaining lower lines, what I see is the remaining doubled lower lines from the point the removal extends.

    The right side, has the lower half showing the far right line is the lower, but at the top it is the highest because of the void with no die breakage.

    Wow. I just joined here and I don't understand one thing you just said.

  • Options
    JBKJBK Posts: 14,776 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Pizzaman said:

    @RobertLahti said:
    The assumed broken die, if taking that direction, would be on the void of dual lines above, not on the sufficient remaining lower lines, what I see is the remaining doubled lower lines from the point the removal extends.

    The right side, has the lower half showing the far right line is the lower, but at the top it is the highest because of the void with no die breakage.

    Wow. I just joined here and I don't understand one thing you just said.

    That's a good thing. ;)

  • Options
    spyglassdesignspyglassdesign Posts: 1,514 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Pizzaman said:

    @RobertLahti said:
    The assumed broken die, if taking that direction, would be on the void of dual lines above, not on the sufficient remaining lower lines, what I see is the remaining doubled lower lines from the point the removal extends.

    The right side, has the lower half showing the far right line is the lower, but at the top it is the highest because of the void with no die breakage.

    Wow. I just joined here and I don't understand one thing you just said.

    I'd be more worried if you did 😅

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file