Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Really bad mint mark position 1989 1c

We'll see...WHAT? What brought your attention...?

Comments

  • Options
    hummingbird_coinshummingbird_coins Posts: 1,682 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks fine to me. I don't think there is such a thing as an inherently "bad" or "good" mintmark position, only that some might be rarer and more interesting than others.

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • Options
    Namvet69Namvet69 Posts: 9,430 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So, tell us what you think you've got there

    BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That's where Denver wanted it. ;)

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The mm looks OK to me.... The cent looks like it has been messed with though... Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    robecrobec Posts: 7,059 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you look at the 1989-D’s in CoinFacts they all have the same look. It is larger than the D mintmark used to be.

  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 34,275 ✭✭✭✭✭

    In 1989 the Engraving Dept. was still adding mint marks to individual working dies by hand, which resulted in many mint mark positions from die to die. They started adding mint marks to circulation coin hubs the following year. Proof coin hubs started having mint marks back in 1985.

    See this forum:

    https://www.ikegroup.info/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=184&sid=75044059b8c0c956181750c093a9ae4d&start=10

    Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That bad mint make sure could use a time-out!

    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • Options
    AllentramAllentram Posts: 119 ✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:
    In 1989 the Engraving Dept. was still adding mint marks to individual working dies by hand, which resulted in many mint mark positions from die to die. They started adding mint marks to circulation coin hubs the following year. Proof coin hubs started having mint marks back in 1985.

    See this forum:

    https://www.ikegroup.info/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=184&sid=75044059b8c0c956181750c093a9ae4d&start=10

    Ah, so that explains it, thanks for providing the explanation. In 1989 when I used cash for nearly every purchase I noticed that the 1989 D cents had mintmarks in several different positions. I held on to them briefly because I found them very interesting, but ultimately spent them all knowing there was no numismatic premium.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file