How about TrollView for the OP? Jeez, it's all about the lighting and angles. Not that hard to figure out. Videos add even more to the picture, which sometimes never show up in still images.
The vast majority of TrueView's are fantastic photos. Additionally the ability to upload those photos, and manage the inventory, along with the Registry sets is also fantastic and adds to my enjoyment of the hobby. Coin photography is an art, lots of variables in play, and for my money, I think PCGS does a commendable job.
I'd call them GlamourShots. I don't mean this in a bad way. I think the photographers do a terrific job by showing the coin in it's best light. Similar to what a photographer would do with a portrait shot of a person.
In my opinion, when the Trueview program was first started I'm sure the premise was to photograph the coin so that it was a good representation of what the coin looked like in hand. Now that colorful toning is all the fad (and BIG premiums are paid for those coins) it has evolved into what we have today. Glamour shots. Like most companies this evolution has taken place to please majority of the customer base. In other words the photographers do a great job giving the bulk of their customers what they want.
Maybe PCGS could consider putting an option when the coin is going to be photographed for a TrueView. They could ask the customer if they want the photograph to represent what the coin looks like on hand or if they want the glamour shot, showing the coin in it's best light.
The term "Glamour Shot" has a definite negative connotation, there really isn't a way to use that in describing a TrueView image to not come across as a compliment to the service. FWIW, I have never had an image done that didn't show my coin(s) as it actually looks. The fact that I might need to rotate a coin in-hand to see it best is normal, we all do it and tend to buy coins based on that.
Another thing, how often do we see a member post a coin here with the sellers image followed by their own image with an explanation of what the coin "really" looks like??
@Maywood said:
The term "Glamour Shot" has a definite negative connotation, there really isn't a way to use that in describing a TrueView image to not come across as a compliment to the service. FWIW, I have never had an image done that didn't show my coin(s) as it actually looks. The fact that I might need to rotate a coin in-hand to see it best is normal, we all do it and tend to buy coins based on that.
Another thing, how often do we see a member post a coin here with the sellers image followed by their own image with an explanation of what the coin "really" looks like??
I respectfully disagree. I did not mean it to be negative. If it did come across as negative, my apologies to the photographers at PCGS. I think the photographers are doing their best to showcase the customers coins in the best light possible. In my opinion that is what a "Glamour Shot" is. Showing or showcasing the coin in it's best light. Just like "Glamour Shot" portfolios do for models and actors.
The name TrueView was created in 2005 by our former CEO Michael Haynes. In 2005 I produced only a few thousand coin images a year, now we do roughly 2,500 a day.
Trueviews are great. You want to show off the coins in your collection, not necessary to magnify or over emphasize the defects. They won’t and/or shouldn’t be used as a substitute for looking for defects with a loupe in my opinion.
And with everybody posting and viewing coin images online these days while the coins are safely tucked away in safety deposit boxes or safes, the photogenic properties of a coin are just as important as the look of the coin in hand. When I think about my coins, I visualize the photos I have of the coin much easier than I can visualize how the coin looked in hand with or without a loupe. Probably because I look at my digital coin albums almost every day while the coins are tucked away in a safety deposit box.
And I also try to mimic Trueviews when taking my own pictures with my iphone so they all have a uniform appearance. Mine usually aren’t quite as good, and certainly can’t be enlarged as much as a TrueView, but the coin images I made tend to be lit up similar enough to Trueviews that as a group they all look similar
I think Trueviews are great. Much better than NGC photovision.
But I would have to see more than TV's to buy most coins. They do tend to make the coins look good. And although I know it's unintentional, TV's of toned coins can be deceiving.
Comments
Glamour Shots... but I think it's already taken...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
TrueLate.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Probably-slighty-different-than-what-it-looks-like-in-hand-but-still-a-better-photo-than-most-of-us-can-take-so-its-okay View.
Young Numismatist
You will see the real coin some day................
Fantasy view
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ce1c/8ce1cfbcf9f8a2aff6bb905e91d855cba3b03cae" alt=""
Reality
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5755c/5755c527a9a300587bd6f917f4498621416ea923" alt=""
Be careful OP. Rules 2 & 4 might apply to this thread.
So I’ll pass on commenting.
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
SpudView
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/309b6/309b69ff393f541b8d282d68af08c76dea8295f8" alt=""
Mr_Spud
PhiltakesbetterpicturesthanwecanView, or perhaps SourgrapesView.
How about TrollView for the OP? Jeez, it's all about the lighting and angles. Not that hard to figure out. Videos add even more to the picture, which sometimes never show up in still images.
10-4,
My Instagram picturesErik
My registry sets
I like TruViews and believe the group does a great job portraying our coins. Cheers, RickO
This... for $5 I think it's definitely worth it...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
The vast majority of TrueView's are fantastic photos. Additionally the ability to upload those photos, and manage the inventory, along with the Registry sets is also fantastic and adds to my enjoyment of the hobby. Coin photography is an art, lots of variables in play, and for my money, I think PCGS does a commendable job.
ViewTrue!
a.k.a "The BUFFINATOR"
I really like TrueViews!!
Phil does an outstanding job!!
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I'd call them GlamourShots. I don't mean this in a bad way. I think the photographers do a terrific job by showing the coin in it's best light. Similar to what a photographer would do with a portrait shot of a person.
In my opinion, when the Trueview program was first started I'm sure the premise was to photograph the coin so that it was a good representation of what the coin looked like in hand. Now that colorful toning is all the fad (and BIG premiums are paid for those coins) it has evolved into what we have today. Glamour shots. Like most companies this evolution has taken place to please majority of the customer base. In other words the photographers do a great job giving the bulk of their customers what they want.
Maybe PCGS could consider putting an option when the coin is going to be photographed for a TrueView. They could ask the customer if they want the photograph to represent what the coin looks like on hand or if they want the glamour shot, showing the coin in it's best light.
Donato
Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set
Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
The term "Glamour Shot" has a definite negative connotation, there really isn't a way to use that in describing a TrueView image to not come across as a compliment to the service. FWIW, I have never had an image done that didn't show my coin(s) as it actually looks. The fact that I might need to rotate a coin in-hand to see it best is normal, we all do it and tend to buy coins based on that.
Another thing, how often do we see a member post a coin here with the sellers image followed by their own image with an explanation of what the coin "really" looks like??
I respectfully disagree. I did not mean it to be negative. If it did come across as negative, my apologies to the photographers at PCGS. I think the photographers are doing their best to showcase the customers coins in the best light possible. In my opinion that is what a "Glamour Shot" is. Showing or showcasing the coin in it's best light. Just like "Glamour Shot" portfolios do for models and actors.
Donato
Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set
Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
The name TrueView was created in 2005 by our former CEO Michael Haynes. In 2005 I produced only a few thousand coin images a year, now we do roughly 2,500 a day.
Radiant Collection: Numismatics and Exonumia of the Atomic Age.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase/3232
TrueViews are a great look for collections. Kudos to PCGS for the service.
I for one really like the TrueViews...
My YouTube Channel
I’m a big fan of the TrueViews. Not only for the pictures, but an additional layer of security against counterfeit coins/holders.
MY GOLD TYPE SET https://pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/complete-type-sets/gold-type-set-12-piece-circulation-strikes-1839-1933/publishedset/321940
Trueviews are great. You want to show off the coins in your collection, not necessary to magnify or over emphasize the defects. They won’t and/or shouldn’t be used as a substitute for looking for defects with a loupe in my opinion.
And with everybody posting and viewing coin images online these days while the coins are safely tucked away in safety deposit boxes or safes, the photogenic properties of a coin are just as important as the look of the coin in hand. When I think about my coins, I visualize the photos I have of the coin much easier than I can visualize how the coin looked in hand with or without a loupe. Probably because I look at my digital coin albums almost every day while the coins are tucked away in a safety deposit box.
And I also try to mimic Trueviews when taking my own pictures with my iphone so they all have a uniform appearance. Mine usually aren’t quite as good, and certainly can’t be enlarged as much as a TrueView, but the coin images I made tend to be lit up similar enough to Trueviews that as a group they all look similar
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9d50/d9d504614f688c676e184b3c686177d656dee30c" alt=""
Mr_Spud
Boudoir Photo
ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")
Gotta love TrueViews!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06531/06531d075a3d53a542e99ba7fb5e3c56ef91fa74" alt=""
No need to rename.
TrueViews are one of the best parts of collecting PCGS coins.
I think Trueviews are great. Much better than NGC photovision.
But I would have to see more than TV's to buy most coins. They do tend to make the coins look good. And although I know it's unintentional, TV's of toned coins can be deceiving.
I like Trueviews. Of course you want to show the coin at its best. Better than let’s see how ugly we can make this one look.
i like them!
Security View.
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
ChromaticVision
FauxView
On the contrary, Google is not your friend.
I would call it "NewHue", the color always looks different than it looks in-hand.
I am a newer collector (started April 2020), and I primarily focus on U.S. Half Cents and Type Coins. Early copper is my favorite.
I'd say:
"Kinda Really Close"
BHNC #203
Here’s an interesting one
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86671/866719f0df0fa04ede78f1a5e98b32a3f5ab0eb2" alt=""
@Floridafacelifter Thank's for pointing that out, I've let the editors know so it can be corrected.
Collector of randomness. Photographer at PCGS. Lover of Harry Potter.