Home U.S. Coin Forum

Question about 1995 American Eagle 10th Anniversary Proof set - Gold/Silver 5 coins

I have 2 of these sets. One is traditional in the nice rectangular maroon 5 coin holder with COA etc. The other is less fancy, in a square box, still the same 5 coins, but no COA...more of a bare bones presentation. Its my understanding that there was a shortage of the nice presentation holders in manufacture and the US Mint instead shipped out the bare bones box set - I've enen seen a card that explains the different packaging. That's all well and good HOWEVER, the bare bones set I have has 2 unusualities......or at least things that seem unusual to me, first the silver round is dated 1994 not 1995 as one would expect in a 1995 set. Second, the $50 Gold coin has roman numeral date on the obverse while all the other coins have a 1995 date. I found a few of these sets pictured online and all have the 1995 date not a roman numeral date. Just looking for any info as what's the deal with the wrong date silver and the roman numeral date vs 1995 Arabic date?

Craig
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!

Comments

  • smuglrsmuglr Posts: 421 ✭✭✭✭

    MCMXCV?

  • ColorfulcoinsColorfulcoins Posts: 3,365 ✭✭✭

    MCMXC (no V). I would think it would have the V for 5.....

    Craig
    If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,732 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 9, 2022 3:19PM

    Something is not right, the eagle should be a 95-w period. Its the money coin. I have had two of those sets over the years, and everything was same as standard box set, just in the substitute packaging.

    If you got this set second hand, and not from THE mint, somebody pulled a switcharoo??

    if it was recieved from mint? I have no Idea why?

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,441 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not a 1995 5-piece proof set. Just five less valuable coins in some sort of holder.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • GoldminersGoldminers Posts: 4,247 ✭✭✭✭✭

    All 5 coins should be dated normal 1995-W, so the two you mentioned are no longer the coins that were originally in the set.

  • smuglrsmuglr Posts: 421 ✭✭✭✭

    The USM used roman numerals on these through 1991. It sounds like someone pieced together a set with a 1990 gold coin, and a 1994 silver eagle.

  • OnastoneOnastone Posts: 4,036 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sorry, sounds like you only have one of these sets.

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,587 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Hope you were not out on the money thing too badly.

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • derrybderryb Posts: 37,221 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Same answer I posted to this question in the PM forum:

    The American gold and silver eagle bullion coin programs began in 1986.

    ASE proofs haves been issued since 1986:

    • 1986-1992 have an S mint mark.
    • 1993-1995 have a P mint mark.
    • A special 1995 W was issued in the five coin gold and silver set with a mintage of 30,125. The set carries a high value with the 1995 ASE W being the money coin, especially if certified.
    • 1986 marked the beginning of the W mint mark on all proofs.

    AGE proofs made their first appearance in 1988:

    • 1988-1991 have the P mint mark and Roman numerals
    • 1992 marked the beginning of Arabic numerals
    • 1992-1993 have a P mint mark
    • 1994 marked the beginning of the W mint mark

    Concerning you odd ball set:

    *There are no known authentic AGEs with a $20 face value (I suspect your $20 post is a typo).

    • You have clarified the AGE is a 1990 P, a valid Roman numeral date for an AGE proof.
    • Your ASE proof(s) are likely authentic coins and carry proof value.
    • All authentic 1995 Gold and Silver sets were sold by the mint with the red US mint presentation boxes.
    • Most likely this set contains authentic coins and was assembled in an aftermarket presentation case by the collecor.

    Repetition of ignorance is ignorance raised to the power two.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Definitely not a mint set.
    Return it if you can. Cheers, RickO

  • labloverlablover Posts: 3,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oh, my heavens...someone has risen from the dead. Glad to see you're still alive Craig. :)

    "If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." Will Rogers
  • PhillyJoePhillyJoe Posts: 2,702 ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 11, 2022 7:12AM

    Always thought this is a set you have to buy in person. The w mint mark is on the reverse of the ASE so just looking at it in the presentation case doesn’t help. Two bad scenarios here: seller knowingly, or unknowingly, sells you a set with a P mint mark. Or, dishonest buyer receives the W proof set, switches with a P, contacts the seller and wants to return for full refund. Probably been happening since 1995 and you don’t want to be the one holding the 5 coin set with the P.

    The Philadelphia Mint: making coins since 1792. We make money by making money. Now in our 225th year thanks to no competition. image
  • erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,195 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good to see you Craig! Here is one of the fine coins from you that I still own...

  • smuglrsmuglr Posts: 421 ✭✭✭✭

    Well the OP said the ASE was dated 1994 and the 1 oz gold dated MCMXC both red flags.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file