Clearly this hobby and the minting process is beyond your level of comprehension. You would do better with a hobby that you don't need to understand the process of how the item is made. Have you thought about collecting Pez dispensers, marbles or Beanie Babies?
Between 1964 and 1979 the Denver mint only used one mm, MMS-008. NO MICRO D, no random mint marks, no random micro letters. ALL DENVER MINTMARKS between 1964 and 1979 USED THE SAME SIZE AND STYLE
You were given this info on at least 2 previous threads where you thought you had micro letters. Please try to do a little research before asking the same question again and again, especially when its already been answered.
@Oldhoopster said:
Between 1964 and 1979 the Denver mint only used one mm, MMS-008. NO MICRO D, no random mint marks, no random micro letters. ALL DENVER MINTMARKS between 1964 and 1979 USED THE SAME SIZE AND STYLE
You were given this info on at least 2 previous threads where you thought you had micro letters. Please try to do a little research before asking the same question again and again, especially when its already been answered.
This!
To the OP. It's not a micro anything just because it looks smaller to you. They have to have used a different size punch at the mint.
Comments
You have 11 cents. You haven't bothered to do any real research yourself. That is all.
10-4,
My Instagram picturesErik
My registry sets
Yep just like these examplesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03d01/03d014466c79a61b908410897adb8a3479910508" alt=":) :)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f7c1/7f7c18721ed8e60bf0a0b078840ff5806f75d71c" alt=""
To be honest this was a response to the micro Sdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03d01/03d014466c79a61b908410897adb8a3479910508" alt=":) :)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03d01/03d014466c79a61b908410897adb8a3479910508" alt=":) :)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e41f9/e41f925760795d494fd95353fe9ef7ae019d1cda" alt=""
Where now the D is in the mix also
I mean in my opinion
Thanks
Yes then it makes a micro/micro clear as day, thus it only makes sense in case one was made way to small. JMO
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e7e6/7e7e61e6edc9d6b4d16d30798a6d0b8e0763d66c" alt=""
I agree Erik, thank you.
But then, there he goes, playing with himself again.
PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLL
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
Clearly this hobby and the minting process is beyond your level of comprehension. You would do better with a hobby that you don't need to understand the process of how the item is made. Have you thought about collecting Pez dispensers, marbles or Beanie Babies?
Between 1964 and 1979 the Denver mint only used one mm, MMS-008. NO MICRO D, no random mint marks, no random micro letters. ALL DENVER MINTMARKS between 1964 and 1979 USED THE SAME SIZE AND STYLE
You were given this info on at least 2 previous threads where you thought you had micro letters. Please try to do a little research before asking the same question again and again, especially when its already been answered.
This!
To the OP. It's not a micro anything just because it looks smaller to you. They have to have used a different size punch at the mint.