@FlyingAl said:
PR66, but that's just a guess, there's no way to accurately grade proofs from photos.
It's possible, it's just that you'd need photos from multiple angles and lighting situations.
Perhaps. I’ll have to try that with one of my proofs at some point, and then do a GTG here. I would bet that it would be better, but still not as good as having the coin in hand. We might be able to get it to the point where it’s similar to grading a MS coin with the amount of hairlines you see being similar to the amount of bag marks you see on a MS coin.
Apparently, I had already sold this coin to a forum member and did not realize until I started looking for it so, I have no pictures other than the TV.
PR65
@gumby1234 said:
Not even a plus? Still looks 66 to me from photos
I’m sure there’s something there holding it back besides the overall appearance which is dull in comparison to another similarly toned specimen in CoinFacts but again, I no longer have possession to confirm.
But if you check CoinFacts you’ll see what I’m talking about. It’s a tad down the list.
Comments
PR67?
Nothing is as expensive as free money.
Pr66
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
Wow nice!
67+ to me - (I have a hard time telling proofs from scans)
PR-66
Young Numismatist
PR66, but that's just a guess, there's no way to accurately grade proofs from photos.
Coin Photographer.
It's possible, it's just that you'd need photos from multiple angles and lighting situations.
Nothing is as expensive as free money.
Perhaps. I’ll have to try that with one of my proofs at some point, and then do a GTG here. I would bet that it would be better, but still not as good as having the coin in hand. We might be able to get it to the point where it’s similar to grading a MS coin with the amount of hairlines you see being similar to the amount of bag marks you see on a MS coin.
Coin Photographer.
PR66
Mr_Spud
That’s why it’s called, guess the gradedata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2168/c21681936111b245ca1a8fdf973133ffa678ee38" alt=":D :D"
There something about this coin,,, I'll be the low-ball 65
naughty naughty , there is nothing wrong with this one, 65 is a below the belt, mind the balls gtg. 🤣😅
I meant no harm... My humble apologizes
I'll say 66+
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
Proof 66 +
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
Apparently, I had already sold this coin to a forum member and did not realize until I started looking for it so, I have no pictures other than the TV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c010/9c010686a553fc23fc2aab28f9fa5ae5abd8dbb7" alt=""
PR65
Good job @Joe_360
Not even a plus? Still looks 66 to me from photos
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
I’m sure there’s something there holding it back besides the overall appearance which is dull in comparison to another similarly toned specimen in CoinFacts but again, I no longer have possession to confirm.
But if you check CoinFacts you’ll see what I’m talking about. It’s a tad down the list.
Darn... Late to the game and I would have got it right....
Cheers, RickO