Home U.S. Coin Forum

Morgan GSA - Is this abnormal?

spyglassdesignspyglassdesign Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭✭✭

Hello,

I picked up a few GSA Morgans at what seem to be decent prices, and I noticed this on one of them. I'm looking at the area where the line goes from "A" in states over to "O" in OF.

Under magnification, it almost appears raised, but I am not certain since I'm not about to take it out of the holder...

Thoughts?

TIA!

Comments

  • spyglassdesignspyglassdesign Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @scotty4449 said:
    I think that's just a die crack, fairly common.

    Would that then make this an "error coin", if so? I love the luster and cartwheels it does regardless :smiley:

  • Namvet69Namvet69 Posts: 9,098 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @spyglassdesign You're in luck cause Morgans have been studied extensively and die cracks are documented and identifiable by going to VAMWorld 2.0 VAM was created by Van Allen and Mallis. Show us the obv and rev so we can appreciate the whole coin. Peace Roy

    BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW

  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,823 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 28, 2022 3:01PM

    Yep, die crack.

    Extremely common, and like you say, raised.

  • shortnockshortnock Posts: 425 ✭✭✭

    Why not leave it in the GSA holder?

  • scotty4449scotty4449 Posts: 717 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @spyglassdesign said:

    Would that then make this an "error coin", if so? I love the luster and cartwheels it does regardless :smiley:

    Not an error, just part of the minting process. Just begins to fall apart over time. Sometimes the cracks can be pretty drastic like this one.

  • spyglassdesignspyglassdesign Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 28, 2022 3:49PM

    @shortnock said:
    Why not leave it in the GSA holder?

    I plan to leave it in the holder (it's still there as of this post). Contemplating whether to get it graded and considering the pros and cons of both TPG's methods... The obverse seems a little rough but the luster is very appealing. Hopefully the pics show it off to some degree!

  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,005 ✭✭✭✭✭

    IMO GSAs are not worth grading unless it has a good shot at 65 or better, which that one appears not to.

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭✭

    that coin is not worth the grading fees. Common and not a super high grade. Looks typical MS63. Keep as is and enjoy. Do check out VAMworld.com

    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,238 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Connecticoin said:
    IMO GSAs are not worth grading unless it has a good shot at 65 or better, which that one appears not to.

    Agree. Especially with the recent increase in prices for raw GSAs.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Really not worth the grading fees, and often can get a slight premium for the GSA holder. Cheers, RickO

  • Che_GrapesChe_Grapes Posts: 1,884 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 29, 2022 6:26AM

    If it was any year but 82 thru 84 it might be worth grading. But this date is very common in GSA and even raw uncirculated. If only it was a 1885 or 1890, etc (1889 - even better!!! :)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file