@SlickCoins said:
Hey all good morning oops 😬 😆
Yes G x G good catch all I like the S C coin also.
Ok,, clearly these are not Master Engraver marks for this was done to the coin I itself.
In my opinion ↑↑↑↓↓↓←→
Master Engraver marks are done to the on the die.
Hmmm makes us all wonder,,,I knew I was wrong somewhere and here it is kinda.
I said Master Engraver on recycled dies 1834 and prior,,, these are not the same on the 1943 coins I've brought to light and adds to the confusion for the 1943 has marks yes but it's super clear those marks are different than the other ones, they look struck on the die and show it when "juiced" aka filters applied to the pictures.
Also note the lack of Master on those marks on 1943 compared to early 1793-1834 examples,,,, JMO
Someone said juiced up,, well it stuck
Thanks all
Awesome coin thanks for sharing
SC
Most of your post has nothing to do with the topic of this thread. Please don't drag other ideas or subjects over here.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Comments
Most of your post has nothing to do with the topic of this thread. Please don't drag other ideas or subjects over here.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Let me submit it. I can guarantee it will get a genuine, not gradable label.
On a good note at least those two big circular G's weren't mistaken for a silver plugged variety.
That's what caused me to inspect further... I thought someone paid $4800 for it because it had two plugs in it.