I like the concept. Not so much on the grading. . .
braddick
Posts: 24,204 ✭✭✭✭✭
Creative slabbing of five Morgans. Neat idea.
The grades? They all look cleaned/processed to me.
peacockcoins
5
Comments
Unholy alliance with a TV seller I'd wager.
RIP Mom- 1932-2012
Yikes!
🤔 How come the label doesn’t state them as such?
You can barely see the face on the 1921... The reverses look better than the obverses though.
I like some of the P-D-S steel cent trio slabs where NGC puts an actual grade on them. Does anyone know if PCGS does anything like that?
Edited because I read "1921" as "1881. Thanks to the below comment that pointed that out.
Young Numismatist
I have seen PCGS multi holder as well shown in this forum.
Collector
75 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 45 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
agree about them looking sub-par.
there are 5 different decades spanning 6.
five scrubbed XF/AUs....not a fan.
Tom
But there isn’t an 1881 in the set
Definitely cleaned. Way too bright. Guess they aren’t technically graded, but still…what’s the point of this?
Dave
I read the label as XF Details, but I could be in the minority.
Coin Photographer.
Interesting display
It would make a nice office decoration or paper weight for a desk. Possibly conversation piece.
Nice display set for show to non-collectors or for instructional purposes. Cheers, RickO
Aren't these multi-holders requested by the submitter? Maybe a special request and not receiving a grade knowing it would be details.
My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
https://n1m.com/bobbysmith1
So what if you took say the same set across the decades and instead had 5 CAC'd MS65 DMPL's in the holder. It could be any sort of group that makes sense but high quality and matched really nicely.
I bet it would get interest in the Morgan community
Pretty sure these have been around since about 2008.
They should change the grade from XF to BU.
Beat Up
BHNC #203