Home U.S. Coin Forum

Trade Dollar price guide increases.

2»

Comments

  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,738 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Goldbully said:
    Just got this beauty earlier in the year from Heritage.

    It really should have the PL designation.


    MS63


    https://www.pcgs.com/cert/44061936

    @Crypto I'd appreciate your thoughts on this 1876.

    edited to add: I'll try and take some pics of the coin in hand and post later.

    Sorry been off the grid for a few weeks.

    Really nice coin but not a proof 76 1/1 because it doesn’t have the die Diagnostics but is clearly a flashy UNC but that thickness of tone will often obscure mirrors and preclude the designation from the reputable TPG

  • basetsbbasetsb Posts: 508 ✭✭✭✭

    Here is my type example

    @basetsb_coins on Instagram

  • GoldbullyGoldbully Posts: 17,557 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Crypto I'd appreciate your thoughts on this 1876.

    edited to add: I'll try and take some pics of the coin in hand and post later.

    Sorry been off the grid for a few weeks.

    Really nice coin but not a proof 76 1/1 because it doesn’t have the die Diagnostics but is clearly a flashy UNC but that thickness of tone will often obscure mirrors and preclude the designation from the reputable TPG

    As always I value your expertise on the Trade Dollar series.

    This particular 1876 really has a PL appearance on the obverse, but not the reverse.

    So I guess that means a coin can only get the PCGS PL designation if both sides are PL.

    Thanks for your comments.

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,169 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 15, 2022 9:46AM

    Here's the Type piece I bought at the end of last year...


    ...and now in my 7070...

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • OGDanOGDan Posts: 3,749 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Goldbully said:
    Just got this beauty earlier in the year from Heritage.

    It really should have the PL designation.


    MS63


    https://www.pcgs.com/cert/44061936

    @Crypto I'd appreciate your thoughts on this 1876.

    edited to add: I'll try and take some pics of the coin in hand and post later.

    I've seen more than one 76 1/1 with very PL obverse, but very frosty reverse. This looks like another one of those. The not PL reverse will always hold it back from any PL designation. Still though...a PL reverse is pretty cool.

  • lermishlermish Posts: 3,313 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just picked up my one non-chopped type piece for my US Design Set. As always, tough to image proofs but it's nice, hint of pink in the fields, sharp obverse devices. But it's not as nice as the PR66+ DCAM with rainbow rim toning I held today. That was probably the best looking coin I've ever seen. Still, very happy with mine!


Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file