An interesting ERROR NEWP! 2016 ASE

asheland · June 4, 2022 3:26PM

I don’t typically mess with error coins, but I found this Interesting. My friend had a roll of 20 initially, he sold five before he discovered that they were all clashed. Another friend of mine, a mutual friend got one raw from the original roll, so the remaining 14 went to NGC. Mostly 69’s and a few 68’s, he let me get one of them.

I find this pretty interesting:

MedalCollector · June 4, 2022 4:53PM

Superb clash!

Kliao · June 4, 2022 5:27PM

Really neat. Never seen one on an ASE before.

asheland · June 4, 2022 6:06PM

@Kliao said:
Really neat. Never seen one on an ASE before.

I read an article and apparently there was some clashing on 2017 Eagles as well. Also I remember a member on here showing some 2016 ASE with a die crack!

MedalCollector · June 4, 2022 6:16PM

@asheland said:

@Kliao said:
Really neat. Never seen one on an ASE before.

I read an article and apparently there was some clashing on 2017 Eagles as well. Also I remember a member on here showing some 2016 ASE with a die crack!

I think there might be a few other dates as well, I know there was a strong clash found on a 2021.

Unknown · June 4, 2022 7:59PM

This content has been removed.

bsshog40 · June 4, 2022 8:24PM

Neat clash!

coinbuf · June 4, 2022 8:44PM

That is cool, but I have to agree that NGC is incorrect. In the case of a clash the defect(clash) is on the die and thus should be a variety, the same as the Lincoln 55/55, the doubling was on the die and it is considered a variety not an error.