I ll go first and say 64 +
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
65+BN. I think it got a sizable color bump.
Young Numismatist, Coin Photography: https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1090140/flyingal-coin-photography-10-photos#latest
<--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -
The reverse looks high AU.
That's a difficult coin to grade.
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
It looks like some field hits are semi-concealed by the tarnish.... so I will say 64. Cheers, RickO
AU58. As I have said before ... if someone wants pay a big premium for the color ... take the money and run!
Its definitely not NT, I'm going to say MS63 and I think it got a 'Questionable color' assignment.
It's a nice coin but I wouldn't buy it for more than $15-$20, too un-natural for me
."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817
toning looks to be obscuring the luster a good deal, i'll WAG 63BN.