How bad rim damage today needs to be for a coin to return in a body bag by PCGS ?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b317/8b317f6262b0490fa17e12393fb9b63c01f94d8d" alt="IKU"
Hello ( About: Authentic. Details grade holdered coins.)
How excess rim damage needs to be to not make it inside a PCGS details holder ?
Or how bent a coin needs to be for PCGS to not place it inside a holder ?
Any experience ?
What are some of the worst damaged coins in PCGS detail holder ?
0
Comments
I imagine the age and rarity of the coin is a major factor.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Much like grading, no hard, defined standards exist. But the graders know it when they see it. Cheers, RickO
PCGS is tougher on that type of damage than NGC in my experience.
A recent thread comes to mind about a buffalo nickel that was struck on a Gold Planchet
The coin was filed into (destruction test to determine authenticity) and came back bodybagged from PCGS.
It later straight graded with the damage at NGC...
I think this sums it up, as that was the only known error of its type, so it "slid" into a straight holder.
Think Chopmarked Trade dollars, "e" and "L" counterstamped bust halves, the 1804 Dollar with a "D" punched in it, and others all in straight holders with descriptions.
about 5 years ago, I send in a beautiful 1839-O $2.5 coin with a counterstamp "L" in it, which is documented to have been done at the subtreasury in the 1800's to indicate a Lightweight planchet...
Came back bodybagged - damaged details. I later found a lot of the support history research so if I send it in again I'll include all of that paperwork in hopes that is straight grades.
It's all about what the people want...
**> about 5 years ago, I send in a beautiful 1839-O $2.5 coin with a counterstamp "L" in it, which is documented to have been done at the subtreasury in the 1800's to indicate a Lightweight planchet...
I learned something new today.
"You can't get just one gun." "You can't get just one tattoo." "You can't get just one 1796 Draped Bust Large Cent."
If the rim damage was significant enough that it shows any evidence of repair, it would be body bagged. Other than that, I think it’s subjective.
I cannot say what the current temperature is on this subject, however this bust half was rejected and the reason given was the rim ding above the cap. I suspect that if not for that it would have been called cleaned, this was rejected ten years ago or so.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b974b/b974bb2b00d03cb3d65b035dc79212884579ac26" alt=""
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
It really depends on the type. For issues that are genuinely rare, certain things are often overlooked. The rim bump near the date was apparently not a deal-breaker for this coin:
or the bump near stars 8&9 on the obverse of this one:
The same thing on a Walker or Morgan would instantly disqualify it.