Home U.S. Coin Forum

How bad rim damage today needs to be for a coin to return in a body bag by PCGS ?

IKUIKU Posts: 65 ✭✭✭
edited May 12, 2022 12:21AM in U.S. Coin Forum

Hello ( About: Authentic. Details grade holdered coins.)
How excess rim damage needs to be to not make it inside a PCGS details holder ?
Or how bent a coin needs to be for PCGS to not place it inside a holder ?
Any experience ?

What are some of the worst damaged coins in PCGS detail holder ?

Comments

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Much like grading, no hard, defined standards exist. But the graders know it when they see it. Cheers, RickO

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,679 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PCGS is tougher on that type of damage than NGC in my experience.

  • LukeMarshallLukeMarshall Posts: 1,991 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @IKU said:
    Hello ( About: Authentic. Details grade holdered coins.)
    How excess rim damage needs to be to not make it inside a PCGS details holder ?
    Or how bent a coin needs to be for PCGS to not place it inside a holder ?
    Any experience ?

    What are some of the worst damaged coins in PCGS detail holder ?

    A recent thread comes to mind about a buffalo nickel that was struck on a Gold Planchet

    The coin was filed into (destruction test to determine authenticity) and came back bodybagged from PCGS.

    It later straight graded with the damage at NGC...

    @PerryHall said:
    I imagine the age and rarity of the coin is a major factor.

    I think this sums it up, as that was the only known error of its type, so it "slid" into a straight holder.

    Think Chopmarked Trade dollars, "e" and "L" counterstamped bust halves, the 1804 Dollar with a "D" punched in it, and others all in straight holders with descriptions.

    about 5 years ago, I send in a beautiful 1839-O $2.5 coin with a counterstamp "L" in it, which is documented to have been done at the subtreasury in the 1800's to indicate a Lightweight planchet...

    Came back bodybagged - damaged details. I later found a lot of the support history research so if I send it in again I'll include all of that paperwork in hopes that is straight grades.

    It's all about what the people want...

  • OmegaraptorOmegaraptor Posts: 541 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LukeMarshall said:

    @IKU said:
    Hello ( About: Authentic. Details grade holdered coins.)
    How excess rim damage needs to be to not make it inside a PCGS details holder ?
    Or how bent a coin needs to be for PCGS to not place it inside a holder ?
    Any experience ?

    What are some of the worst damaged coins in PCGS detail holder ?

    A recent thread comes to mind about a buffalo nickel that was struck on a Gold Planchet

    The coin was filed into (destruction test to determine authenticity) and came back bodybagged from PCGS.

    It later straight graded with the damage at NGC...

    @PerryHall said:
    I imagine the age and rarity of the coin is a major factor.

    I think this sums it up, as that was the only known error of its type, so it "slid" into a straight holder.

    Think Chopmarked Trade dollars, "e" and "L" counterstamped bust halves, the 1804 Dollar with a "D" punched in it, and others all in straight holders with descriptions.

    **> about 5 years ago, I send in a beautiful 1839-O $2.5 coin with a counterstamp "L" in it, which is documented to have been done at the subtreasury in the 1800's to indicate a Lightweight planchet...

    Came back bodybagged - damaged details. I later found a lot of the support history research so if I send it in again I'll include all of that paperwork in hopes that is straight grades. **

    I learned something new today.

    "You can't get just one gun." "You can't get just one tattoo." "You can't get just one 1796 Draped Bust Large Cent."

  • raysrays Posts: 2,421 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If the rim damage was significant enough that it shows any evidence of repair, it would be body bagged. Other than that, I think it’s subjective.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,565 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 12, 2022 8:47PM

    I cannot say what the current temperature is on this subject, however this bust half was rejected and the reason given was the rim ding above the cap. I suspect that if not for that it would have been called cleaned, this was rejected ten years ago or so.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,823 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It really depends on the type. For issues that are genuinely rare, certain things are often overlooked. The rim bump near the date was apparently not a deal-breaker for this coin:

    or the bump near stars 8&9 on the obverse of this one:

    The same thing on a Walker or Morgan would instantly disqualify it.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file