$1 1795 This is a poor one

lilolme

As in PO01.
Not my thing but I want it. Clean unmarred look.
This is in a lowball set named Lance. (anyone here?)
Early dollar people - I know there are limited major varieties of these, but what gives this away as a 1795 2 Leaves (B-1, BB-21) as graded?

amwldcoin

That looks like about the only thing that might be discernable on the reverse!

braddick

I agree. That one is neat, and I am impressed (if not also surprised) that PCGS was able to slab it.

Dave99B

That’s an awesome dollar!

Dave

pocketpiececommems

Looks like the King of the Early Dollars😎

jesbroken

That is neat that PCGS could ID it as a 1795.
Jim

jesbroken

A question for pros in this series. Do not mean to hijack the OP's post, but found this in regards to this coin.
I notice that in CoinFacts it shows the following difference in 2 leaves and 3 leaves. I notice how far away the cherry is in the 2 leaves from the leaves compared to the 3 leaves cherry being closer.
Then ebay offers a 1794 2 leaves that has the cherry close like the 3 leaves. What is up with that, does the cherry vary with different varieties of the 2 leaf? PCGS calls this a 39986 which shows the berry to be away from the leaves yet the one on ebay shows it to be close. Is this an NGC error or a variety not labeled correctly?
Thank you,
Jim

eBay item number:115341550501

numisma

@jesbroken you are posting about a flowing hair half dollar, whereas @lilolme posted about a flowing hair dollar.

Smudge

The mint got their money’s worth out of that one. Just a cool coin.