Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Thanks anyway

2»

Comments

  • miwlvrnmiwlvrn Posts: 4,264 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 24, 2022 5:00AM

    This Sugar Daddy situation seems like it is exactly following the precedent set by the 1935 Muratti Dorothy Poynton card which was formerly incorrectly labeled as w/ Babe Ruth, and then after compelling evidence to the contrary plus associated valid worthwhile complaining about this error rolled in, the TPG's eventually changed their specs data. However, the volume of mislabeled cards is large enough that the error (and therefore the incredibly overvalued prices) will live on, despite the basis being on a labeling error.

    https://prewarcards.com/2018/03/04/1935-36-muratti-nope-still-not-a-babe-ruth-card/

    There are a few threads covering this Muratti topic that you can find on Blowout and on Net54 if you want to know more about it.

  • EchoCanyonEchoCanyon Posts: 2,288 ✭✭✭

    @brad31 said:
    I guess it’s fitting that both the card that started it and the thread about it are mislabeled now.

    genius observation, :-)

  • GreenSneakersGreenSneakers Posts: 908 ✭✭✭✭

    The appropriate title for this thread is “Who’s Your Sugar Daddy?”

    And from what I understand, Pete Rose has been the answer to that question more than once.

Sign In or Register to comment.