Home U.S. Coin Forum

PCGS AU DMPL?

REALGATORREALGATOR Posts: 2,622 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited March 5, 2022 4:41AM in U.S. Coin Forum

I have noticed PCGS has only graded a single DMPL Morgan as 58Dmpl (1896-o). So is it basically impossible to have a non mint state deep mirror Morgan?

Comments

  • fiftysevenerfiftysevener Posts: 916 ✭✭✭✭

    There are many DMPL Morgans not so designated due to different qualifying issues. For instance toned DMPL Morgans even mint state coins do not get the designation because they are toned too dark and just don't have the reflectivity. I wish the TPG's would be more consistent as I see many DMPL coins with no cameo contrast and others that just don't look like the mirrors are deep enough to qualify.

  • david3142david3142 Posts: 3,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PCGS as a rule just doesn’t give out the designation to AU coins except they seemed to have slipped in that one case. NGC does designate AU coins as PL or DMPL and you can see many of them available for sale. AU coins tend to have hairlines that interfere with the mirrors so they generally don’t look as nice (or as deep) as they would have in MS.

  • ike126ike126 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @fiftysevener said:
    There are many DMPL Morgans not so designated due to different qualifying issues. For instance toned DMPL Morgans even mint state coins do not get the designation because they are toned too dark and just don't have the reflectivity. I wish the TPG's would be more consistent as I see many DMPL coins with no cameo contrast and others that just don't look like the mirrors are deep enough to qualify.

    I get what your saying with consistency about the DMPLS but you necessarily don't need to look black and white cameo to be a full DMPL. I have a couple graded that don't have black and white cameo but you could see 8 or 10 inches out with my DMPL meter.

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,328 ✭✭✭✭✭

    An AU-58 should have the smallest amount of wear possible. Given that, it's very possible for an AU-58 to be a DMPL.

    It's the same with a full head Standing Liberty Quarter in AU-58. If it makes the AU-58 grade, it's quite possible.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • REALGATORREALGATOR Posts: 2,622 ✭✭✭✭✭

    _An AU-58 should have the smallest amount of wear possible. Given that, it's very possible for an AU-58 to be a DMPL.

    _

    It seems PCGS disagrees.

  • ike126ike126 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm sure one day one will be made

  • fiftysevenerfiftysevener Posts: 916 ✭✭✭✭

    @ike126 said:

    @fiftysevener said:
    There are many DMPL Morgans not so designated due to different qualifying issues. For instance toned DMPL Morgans even mint state coins do not get the designation because they are toned too dark and just don't have the reflectivity. I wish the TPG's would be more consistent as I see many DMPL coins with no cameo contrast and others that just don't look like the mirrors are deep enough to qualify.

    I get what your saying with consistency about the DMPLS but you necessarily don't need to look black and white cameo to be a full DMPL. I have a couple graded that don't have black and white cameo but you could see 8 or 10 inches out with my DMPL meter.

    Yes I have owned DMPL's with little contrast but would like to know more about how they determine the 8 to 10 in. mirrors. Is your meter a mirror ?

  • ike126ike126 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • sweetwillietsweetwilliet Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭

    @REALGATOR said:
    _An AU-58 should have the smallest amount of wear possible. Given that, it's very possible for an AU-58 to be a DMPL.

    _

    It seems PCGS disagrees.

    It is certainly possible to have a deep mirror AU Morgan. PCGS has determined, however, to only award the dmpl designation to mint state coins. There is a difference.

    There are a few pl and dmpl Morgans in the pop reports as AU coins by PCGS. They are likely just data entry errors. One pl AU was actually posted years ago, in the pop report it was AU pl by cert number, but on the holder it only said AU. My theory is that they would deserve the designation and maybe 2 graders thought 60pl and one AU, and somehow got thru as AU pl. I do not know that as fact, just guessing.

    Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    Will’sProoflikes
  • REALGATORREALGATOR Posts: 2,622 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @sweetwilliet said:

    It is certainly possible to have a deep mirror AU Morgan. PCGS has determined, however, to only award the dmpl designation to mint state coins. There is a difference.

    Well ok, but why?

  • david3142david3142 Posts: 3,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @REALGATOR said:

    @sweetwilliet said:

    It is certainly possible to have a deep mirror AU Morgan. PCGS has determined, however, to only award the dmpl designation to mint state coins. There is a difference.

    Well ok, but why?

    They also didn’t grade non-Morgans (except some modern special issues) as PL until a couple of years ago. I don’t know why they made the AU/MS PL decision but perhaps they will change it.

  • ike126ike126 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very weird how they won't do it. Does anyone here know if ATS has done it??

  • david3142david3142 Posts: 3,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ike126 said:
    Very weird how they won't do it. Does anyone here know if ATS has done it??

    Yes, as I mentioned above. There are about 1000 NGC AU PL or DMPL coins. There are some as low as AU53PL.

  • sweetwillietsweetwilliet Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭

    @david3142 said:

    @REALGATOR said:

    @sweetwilliet said:

    It is certainly possible to have a deep mirror AU Morgan. PCGS has determined, however, to only award the dmpl designation to mint state coins. There is a difference.

    Well ok, but why?

    They also didn’t grade non-Morgans (except some modern special issues) as PL until a couple of years ago. I don’t know why they made the AU/MS PL decision but perhaps they will change it.

    Same here, don’t know why they made that decision years ago, but they have remained consistent. As already mentioned, they are now designating some non Morgans as pl, so maybe one day they will grade deserving AU coins as pl or dmpl.

    Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    Will’sProoflikes
  • ike126ike126 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Who knows maybe one day our host will change their mind etc. Thanks for that info gonna try 2 find some pics on them

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file