Opinions wanted on this published page, showing L&S of a date.
emeraldATV
Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭✭✭
SMALL
LARGE
?
1
emeraldATV
Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
100x both are bigger
My opinion is clearly &^%$()!@ Cheers, RickO
Could you zoom in a little closer...
We've really jumped the proverbial shark when we are magnifying printed pages for no apparent reason other than we can...
It's really quite obvious when seen AT NORMAL SIZE, side-by-side.
Although,
when seen AT NORMAL SIZE ( in the book, from a normal reading distance ) is why where here.
As I've been following this art of the decimal (small) two, it (The 1982 date) seems to be splitting into another variety. (s)
According to this book and its photos they refer to a small 2 to be side by side this 8 formation sometimes referred to as the snowman formation.
Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm easy.
I am fully on board with both the 2 and 8
They certainly are and can’t be denied their identity
I do have a problem with the name. I’d like to call it bent. It would be interesting to see if you could perform microscopic surgery to go with those pics. You could take a cent and make it get bent.
The small date always follows the snow cone affect (?) whipped staff ...? Name it what you want.
So, If I find a eight 3.1 with art... Check mate ?
Woo Woo ...Zinc
So many directions to go, with so many distractions or road blocks to laugh at.
(Just for giggles)
Now this is no laughing matter.
3.1 with a stenciled MM of a D ?
If I place a sheet of onion skin paper on this and pastel the image, with a result D image, what ?
Coin looks vg
You've been here for over 3 years now and still don't know what PMD is.
Why should I Post the Mint about Damage ?
Why should you continually post damage on CU??
Best Of...