@Erniegee said:
And each one of them are ms-70 grade
There are only 11 proofs graded 70 out of just under 4 million minted and none graded above MS67+ in coins minted for circulation. And yet all 50 of your “SMS” Lincoln’s are 70?
Even the SMS. Lincoln’s from the 1965-67 sets only have one coin graded higher than 68 and that is a 69.
@Erniegee said:
And each one of them are ms-70 grade
There are only 11 proofs graded 70 out of just under 4 million minted and none graded above MS67+ in coins minted for circulation. And yet all 50 of your “SMS” Lincoln’s are 70?
Even the SMS. Lincoln’s from the 1965-67 sets only have one coin graded higher than 68 and that is a 69.
I doubt that the troll cares about any facts. His posts make it clear that he’s gone out of his way to make absurd assertions.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
@Fraz said:
Please, @Erniegee, I desire to hear as much of that story as you know how to tell if you can’t photograph them fast enough. There’s gotta be a story about changing your drawers when you found it, trembling handover of cash, or maybe a Sunday night bid.
Finish the story, dammit.
I think it ends, "And they lived happily ever after."
Just in case you do not already know this,.......................
..................... the 1964 cents that you posted photos of are run of the mill, Proof Cents and not 1964 SMS Cents.
About 4,000,000 1964 Proof Cents were produced by the Mint. They can be easily found and purchased today for $1.00 per coin and likely much less than $1.00 per coin.
If you acquired these 1964 Cents truly believing that they are 1964 SMS Cents (and if you paid UP to purchase them) you made a mistake. If the seller told you the Cents were 1964 SMS Cents (and if you believed the seller) then shame on both of you.
FYI.
Here is a Trueview Photograph of a 1964 SMS Cent that graded SP68RD.
Here is a Trueview Photograph of a 1964 Proof Cent that graded PF68RD.
Your 1964 Cents look like and are Proof Cents. They are not 1964 SMS Cents.
If you really believe that your 1964 Cents are SMS Cents, then submit them to PCGS for grading. If PCGS agrees with you and grades your Cents as 1964 SMS Cents then you will:
Have 50 Cents that are worth thousands of dollars each;
Prove to forum members (including me) that you are correct and that forum members are not correct.
Good luck if you submit your Cents for grading. Let us know the results.
@Erniegee said:
And they was made with no blemishes no scratches no imperfections whatsoever so what would you grade them at if that was the case questions all I got
They may well have not had any blemishes or scratches or imperfections but the way you are shuffling them around willy-nilly like you are in the various photos would make me a bit concerned.
Why not place each one carefully into a plastic flip so as to preserve these little treasures for future generations?
It would be the correct and respectful act to perform.
Answers
There are only 11 proofs graded 70 out of just under 4 million minted and none graded above MS67+ in coins minted for circulation. And yet all 50 of your “SMS” Lincoln’s are 70?
Even the SMS. Lincoln’s from the 1965-67 sets only have one coin graded higher than 68 and that is a 69.
- Bob -
MPL's - Lincolns of Color
Central Valley Roosevelts
I doubt that the troll cares about any facts. His posts make it clear that he’s gone out of his way to make absurd assertions.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I think it ends, "And they lived happily ever after."
peacockcoins
Cat got ur tung
Where's the Rolex?
🤔🙃
I got a question if money talks why does b******* walk
Those are some really hammered coins with really square rims, but I still don't see any proof that they are SMS coins.
I got another story to tell if you want to hear it but I don't know y'all jump the conclusions pretty bad just in the conclusions make you lose money
Pardon me I meant jumping in the conclusions
And I never said that they was graded at ms-70 I said they would grade at MS70
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=1964+lincoln+proof+roll&_sacat=0&LH_Sold=1&LH_Complete=1&_sop=16
(The roll that sold for $3.25 plus $2 shipping might have been a good deal)
Since you know so much about this troll tell me what that coin agreed at let's see how good of a collector you are
You shouldn't call yourself a troll. It makes it too easy.
And by the way guy they're not special meant set they're not proofs they're special mint strik
es that was not released to the public
And they was made with no blemishes no scratches no imperfections whatsoever so what would you grade them at if that was the case questions all I got
Just in case you do not already know this,.......................
..................... the 1964 cents that you posted photos of are run of the mill, Proof Cents and not 1964 SMS Cents.
About 4,000,000 1964 Proof Cents were produced by the Mint. They can be easily found and purchased today for $1.00 per coin and likely much less than $1.00 per coin.
If you acquired these 1964 Cents truly believing that they are 1964 SMS Cents (and if you paid UP to purchase them) you made a mistake. If the seller told you the Cents were 1964 SMS Cents (and if you believed the seller) then shame on both of you.
FYI.
Here is a Trueview Photograph of a 1964 SMS Cent that graded SP68RD.
Here is a Trueview Photograph of a 1964 Proof Cent that graded PF68RD.
Your 1964 Cents look like and are Proof Cents. They are not 1964 SMS Cents.
If you really believe that your 1964 Cents are SMS Cents, then submit them to PCGS for grading. If PCGS agrees with you and grades your Cents as 1964 SMS Cents then you will:
Have 50 Cents that are worth thousands of dollars each;
Prove to forum members (including me) that you are correct and that forum members are not correct.
Good luck if you submit your Cents for grading. Let us know the results.
I don't mind mind the lack of knowledge of new posters like him, but the defiance is what bothers me.
The lack of knowledge could be feigned by a person who actually knows better but just continues to troll.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
They may well have not had any blemishes or scratches or imperfections but the way you are shuffling them around willy-nilly like you are in the various photos would make me a bit concerned.
Why not place each one carefully into a plastic flip so as to preserve these little treasures for future generations?
It would be the correct and respectful act to perform.
peacockcoins
Your post says :
" And each one of them are ms-70 grade : "
Thought we agreed not to feed the trolls...
This is simply a pathetic PBM with no life trolling you guys,
BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out
PBM?
I for one will not dignify this post with… oh wait! Nevermind!
Empty Nest Collection
Matt’s Mattes
Prior Board Member?
I call it Previously Banned Member
BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out
Pharmacy Benefit Manager
PBM?> @yspsales said:
Ah...
I don't think Trish was ever banned.