Home U.S. Coin Forum

1875 S Twenty Cent Piece in PCGS MS67 from Regency 50

TheMayorTheMayor Posts: 229 ✭✭✭✭✭

Now that Regency 50 has closed, I think this is fair game to discuss. I had my eye on the 1875 S twenty cent piece in PCGS MS67, not as a potential purchase, but I wanted to see if it would attract a bid. The same coin sold at Heritage in April 2021 as an NGC MS65* for $9,024. Legend had an estimate of $45,000-$50,000 on the lot and required a bid of $27,000 (or thereabouts) to open. Perhaps predictably, the lot was passed. I was curious to see what 9 months and a fairly nice plastic makeover would do for this beauty if it were allowed to open with a low bid and no reserve. Any guesses where this would have cleared?



Comments

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 33,693 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No bean?

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • mavs2583mavs2583 Posts: 200 ✭✭✭✭

    Good eye for seeing this was re slabbed. This is one of the coins they have for direct sale now through make an offer, and I’m curious myself.

  • The_Dinosaur_ManThe_Dinosaur_Man Posts: 998 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What a nice piece. Great toning too. I would love to see it in person.

    Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
    Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you.
    https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.

  • TheMayorTheMayor Posts: 229 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mavs2583 said:
    Good eye for seeing this was re slabbed. This is one of the coins they have for direct sale now through make an offer, and I’m curious myself.

    It has a fairly distinct look and I remembered liking it and tracking it at Heritage, but the bidding got too rich for my blood. $9k is about 4x what an 1875S in NGC MS65 without CAC typically sells for, which I thought was too high a multiple for the eye appeal/color. An error on my part clearly - I imagine whoever bought it is going to make a nice profit if they haven't already.

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 33,693 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Need to see it in person

    Hard to judge it from either set of pictures

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MsMorrisine said:
    No bean?

    Neither time. I'm thinking CAC didn't like the color on it.

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,219 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The obverse of the 20c kind of reminds me of the obverse on this dime.
    (The 20c is 65 points higher in grade. . .)

    peacockcoins

  • TheMayorTheMayor Posts: 229 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @braddick said:
    The obverse of the 20c kind of reminds me of the obverse on this dime.
    (The 20c is 65 points higher in grade. . .)

    Nice dime, but did it CAC? ;)

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,548 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I wonder what the grade was and what holder it was in prior to the 65*

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,738 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @cameonut2011 said:

    @MsMorrisine said:
    No bean?

    Neither time. I'm thinking CAC didn't like the color on it.

    Or the strike, very soft centers esp for the 67 lever

  • P0CKETCHANGEP0CKETCHANGE Posts: 2,825 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Crypto said:

    @cameonut2011 said:

    @MsMorrisine said:
    No bean?

    Neither time. I'm thinking CAC didn't like the color on it.

    Or the strike, very soft centers esp for the 67 lever

    Good call out. I have a 63 that has a much better strike on both the obverse and reverse.

    Nothing is as expensive as free money.

  • bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pretty optimistic estimate from Legend with an opening bid of 3X what it sold for at Heritage. Maybe Collectors are wising up to this plastic game that is being played. Auction records are giving the Collector more transparency with which to make their decisions.

  • joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,754 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A standard ms65 1875-s is worth 2000-2500.
    a standard ms66 1875-s is worth 3000-4500

    A standard ms67 is worth 15-22000

    When this coin sold as an ms65* it was purchased thinking the coin MUST ms67. If it doesnt, its a $5k loss.

    So the buyer was right and got it into an ms67 holder. Winner for them. However next comes what is an ms67 worth? I say 15k-22k for coins not stickered.

    a 27k bid brings the coin to almost 30k money-which is over ms67 cac and close to ms68 money.
    I just think it was overpriced

    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • RayboRaybo Posts: 5,330 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MsMorrisine said:
    No bean?

    Do you see a bean on either of the TPG coins?

  • RayboRaybo Posts: 5,330 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @joebb21 said:
    A standard ms65 1875-s is worth 2000-2500.
    a standard ms66 1875-s is worth 3000-4500

    A standard ms67 is worth 15-22000

    When this coin sold as an ms65* it was purchased thinking the coin MUST ms67. If it doesnt, its a $5k loss.

    So the buyer was right and got it into an ms67 holder. Winner for them. However next comes what is an ms67 worth? I say 15k-22k for coins not stickered.

    a 27k bid brings the coin to almost 30k money-which is over ms67 cac and close to ms68 money.
    I just think it was overpriced

    I'm going to have to buy "standard coins" from now on.
    Sorry but it doesn't work that way.

  • Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just me but came back on the market to fast. No one wants to see a coin that was just put in a new holder with that kind of bump and pay full tilt.



    Hoard the keys.
  • Joey29Joey29 Posts: 458 ✭✭✭
    edited January 29, 2022 10:47PM

    @joebb21 said:
    A standard ms65 1875-s is worth 2000-2500.
    a standard ms66 1875-s is worth 3000-4500

    A standard ms67 is worth 15-22000

    When this coin sold as an ms65* it was purchased thinking the coin MUST ms67. If it doesnt, its a $5k loss.

    So the buyer was right and got it into an ms67 holder. Winner for them. However next comes what is an ms67 worth? I say 15k-22k for coins not stickered.

    a 27k bid brings the coin to almost 30k money-which is over ms67 cac and close to ms68 money.
    I just think it was overpriced

    I doubt the buyer knew it would upgrade to a 67, maybe a 66? How about the buyer just got lucky!!! If a sure 67 bidders would have gone to 15-20K

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,008 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Type2 said:
    Just me but came back on the market to fast. No one wants to see a coin that was just put in a new holder with that kind of bump and pay full tilt.

    That makes sense from the point of view of potential bidders who are aware of the coin’s previous history. However, when a coin has enjoyed a two-point grade increase into a different grading company’s holder and is being offered by a different auction company, chances are good that many potential bidders will be unaware.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is an amazing grade jump....I wonder if it was submitted raw for the regrade. Cheers, RickO

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Am I the only one (perhaps other than @ricko) to find the color distracting? I think it is garish and ugly. It almost looks like a kid took a crayon to it.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,008 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @cameonut2011 said:
    Am I the only one (perhaps other than @ricko) to find the color distracting? I think it is garish and ugly. It almost looks like a kid took a crayon to it.

    I’ve seen the coin in hand and think it’s exquisite. That aside, don’t you like any crayon colors?😉

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @cameonut2011 said:
    Am I the only one (perhaps other than @ricko) to find the color distracting? I think it is garish and ugly. It almost looks like a kid took a crayon to it.

    I’ve seen the coin in hand and think it’s exquisite. That aside, don’t you like any crayon colors?😉

    I’m usually a fan of toning, but those photos do nothing for me. I would definitely trust your in hand inspection though. Some pieces just aren’t photogenic.

    On another note, why do you think it failed CAC?

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 30, 2022 7:17AM

    @bolivarshagnasty said:
    Auction records are giving the Collector more transparency with which to make their decisions.

    I like how PCGS cert verification links to past auctions.

    It would be nice to have a database of coins across cert numbers.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,008 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @cameonut2011 said:

    @MFeld said:

    @cameonut2011 said:
    Am I the only one (perhaps other than @ricko) to find the color distracting? I think it is garish and ugly. It almost looks like a kid took a crayon to it.

    I’ve seen the coin in hand and think it’s exquisite. That aside, don’t you like any crayon colors?😉

    I’m usually a fan of toning, but those photos do nothing for me. I would definitely trust your in hand inspection though. Some pieces just aren’t photogenic.

    On another note, why do you think it failed CAC?

    I was afraid you might ask, because I really don’t have a clue in this case.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • fathomfathom Posts: 1,779 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Condition rarity. Not a rare date.

    No star centrils, a weak strike but I think the color is great.

    IMO the coin itself should be rare and high grade before spending that kind of money, even for registry. But I get the competitive nature of humanity.

  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 7,364 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @cameonut2011 said:
    Am I the only one (perhaps other than @ricko) to find the color distracting? I think it is garish and ugly. It almost looks like a kid took a crayon to it.

    I do but we’re assuming the TV is a good representation.

    Seated Half Society member #38
    "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
  • TheMayorTheMayor Posts: 229 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Catbert said:

    @cameonut2011 said:
    Am I the only one (perhaps other than @ricko) to find the color distracting? I think it is garish and ugly. It almost looks like a kid took a crayon to it.

    I do but we’re assuming the TV is a good representation.

    I agree - that is a big assumption. Luster is going to have such a big impact on the in-hand eye appeal of a coin with this type of color and it can be very difficult to capture in an image.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,569 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It sure is a good thing that we don't have to worry about gradeflation when it comes to coins like this. ;)

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file