Leaving an image, after 2008 US Mint coins by computer design.

Actually it's probable, conducting test strikes.
I'd think the image was created on screen and has no valid url record to recall simply if deleted.
When testing a new choice of design adjustment, the computer designer would need to leave the image in case the outcome is chosen FOR the original instead.
That's how a modified hub doubled die is possible in the single squeeze hubbing era.
We'll see...WHAT? What brought your attention...?
2
Comments
I'm not sure what you're talking about. Can you make your point more clearly?
Nope, he has made 11 threads and only 1 comment on any of them.
I don't want to be mean, just in case the OP actually has issues, but more likely OP is messing with us.
@moursund "just in case the OP actually has issues"
My name isn't Justin Case..... but I agree with you.
@RobertLahti.... Are you submitting a postulation for discussion? Or is this a statement based on informed, evidentiary reasoning? Cheers, RickO
I think this refers back to one of the threads where someone pointed out that it wasn't possible to have a "modified hub doubled die" using the single squeeze hubbing method.
That said, the comment appears to be nonsensical as it is somehow comparing an artist's rendition to the actual hubbing method.
Thanks again for clearing this up. I didn’t see this listed in your currecy exchange.
🎶 shout shout, let it all out 🎶
Clearly the OP does not understand the minting process. But, hey, let's not let facts get in the way.
Or maybe our first bot troll?