Home U.S. Coin Forum

Professional Life, Rockford, Illinois.

Some had a hard time seeing how reasoning correlated with this.

How proper representation by a claim of reference fits what would need to be in those places to garner reasonable doubt.

An omitted image would have a former place, no longer in that place once pursued for another choice.

1.)The top of the former stairs are nobby where stairs would be running across, making the image look like that.

2.)The top of the stair "implied omitted image" would have the same end of that die that remains.

3.)The same image in its correct place being stairs no longer there is the same segmented tip the omitted image running through the tip of Lincolns coat retains at the window.

Don't you think the integrity of our numismatic foundation is worth a second look?
I don't tell the US Mint what they might or might not have done.
It has always required our eyes to see evidence of likliness, because we don't know what they might or might not have done.

We'll see...WHAT? What brought your attention...?

Comments

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file