Based on the rim damage, it looks like it was pressed into one of those encased cent tokens.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Both were damaged after the left the mint. The 1937 was pressed and something like a piece of leather was used to protect the obverse. Sometimes called a Texas cent (but many times both sides are visible
The 1954D was in a Lucky Coin/Advertising holder at one time.
@Oldhoopster said:
Both were damaged after the left the mint. The 1937 was pressed and something like a piece of leather was used to protect the obverse. Sometimes called a Texas cent (but many times both sides are visible
The 1954D was in a Lucky Coin/Advertising holder at one time.
I agree with the assessments above. Those coins that were in the holders occasionally appear in change and look like an error coin to some. We have seen them here quite often. Cheers, RickO
Comments
I also have several of these. What causes this?
Based on the rim damage, it looks like it was pressed into one of those encased cent tokens.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Both were damaged after the left the mint. The 1937 was pressed and something like a piece of leather was used to protect the obverse. Sometimes called a Texas cent (but many times both sides are visible
The 1954D was in a Lucky Coin/Advertising holder at one time.
Your 1954-D was removed from an encasement. The 1937 was probably placed face down on a railroad track atop a piece of leather. Both PMD.
One of these things?
Yes.
I agree with the assessments above. Those coins that were in the holders occasionally appear in change and look like an error coin to some. We have seen them here quite often. Cheers, RickO