Lincoln Penny's

I have a 1964 D Lincoln Penny I think maybe a proof coin. I'm not sure. The grade is very high in my opinion. What do you all think?
I will post a picture as soon as I figure out how. Sorry everyone
0
I have a 1964 D Lincoln Penny I think maybe a proof coin. I'm not sure. The grade is very high in my opinion. What do you all think?
I will post a picture as soon as I figure out how. Sorry everyone
Comments
How do I attach photos to my discussion topic?
A 1964 proof cent wouldn't have a mintmark. May be a high grade coin or could be polished.
Click on the box indicated below, and then Choose Files. Welcome aboard! Look forward to your pictures.

You do not have a proof 1964-D cent, I do not have to see a photo to say that with 100% confidence.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Copy photo then paste onto your post. Simple.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Guessing - you can’t upload and post photos because you are not a full member
Try late Monday or Tuesday
I will also say you absolutely do not have a 1964-D proof.
Even without seeing it.
None were made.
If it is a 1964-D it will be little more than face value regardless of the grade. It is an extremely common date that was saved in huge quantities during the final stages of the late 1950s-early 1960s coin collecting boom. That particular boom came to a crashing end in May of 1964 but by that time many, many 1964-D cents had already been hoarded by collectors/speculators.
@Meandyou4ever0 .... Welcome aboard... As mentioned above, the cent is not a proof.... No D cents were proofs. Cheers, RickO
Welcome aboard.
As others have said, it cannot be a proof cent.
However, it could be proof-like. If so, it could be more valuable than a 1964 proof cent.
"Proof-like" would require mirror-like reflectivity in the fields. "Proof" is not a declaration of the degree of preservation but a type of strike. A perfectly struck, perfectly preserved "business strike" coin with not a single mark on it is still not a "proof".
This very well could be a discovery coin. Let's keep our options open until @Mfeld shows up.
They did mint 1964-D peace dollars, didn't they?
I know you're being funny but let's not give too much false hope.
This new poster might very well think that proof is a grading term which we all know it's not.
I gotta say this isn't the first time I've seen this mistake being made..
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso
Not in proof, they didn't.