I know the scans are not optimal. There is no trueview, and the second set is only my meager attempt, while the first set is the original seller scans.
Nice frosty coin. I'll go 64, and I'd encourage you to get some Maguire's PlastX polish, and a soft microfiber cloth, slightly damp, and polish that holder. You'll have it looking new again.
IMO Slab shot always make coins look better. I mean yeah, they hide scratches but its that 'in hand' look, where eye appeal trumps some potential small marks. Nice coin! Not sure where I would have been but probably 64/65 before.
Very nice coin. The first pic was blurred and looked like 64 or even AU but showed the luster and the second pic, however terrible showed that the details were in fact sharp. Put those two together and a quick look at Coin facts reveals that even 67's and 8's show what looks like to be rub on liberty's arm etc. when in fact I think it's just color/acceptable.
Regardless, It's time to send in for the upgrade - Still looks 67 to me.
Very nice. I was leaning 65 because it was difficult to judge the luster from the photographs. Enjoy!
The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
Thanks all, and thanks for the comments, yes it's a keeper, looks better in hand.
I get the wags, posted with these sub-par scans, and being it was a GTG, I took a chance on this one. I imagined few would get it right, if any. Hence these are called GTG.
Glad at least one hit it on the nail, and another was at the door but it hit him ( @mannie gray ).
Comments
64
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
Blurry pics. 64?
64
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
It looks around a gem.
I would guess 65. Very nice!
Marginal photos, but I'll WAG 64.
I'll go with 63.
66 but I like it as a 67.
Wow, love the look.
Color and luster.
I’m going with 65.
I know the scans are not optimal. There is no trueview, and the second set is only my meager attempt, while the first set is the original seller scans.
65/shot 6
Photos show a pretty half dime, maybe MS-65.
I believe the die variety is V-9b, based on the reverse clash pattern and date position.
Nice frosty coin. I'll go 64, and I'd encourage you to get some Maguire's PlastX polish, and a soft microfiber cloth, slightly damp, and polish that holder. You'll have it looking new again.
That one looks like a 65 to me....Nice condition. Cheers, RickO
65.
24 hrs is fair, I'll post the slab in 15 minutes
MS 64+
Very nice! 65
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
and the winner is @Coinscratch
I was late to the party but guessed 65. Slab shot makes the coin look better for whatever reason
IMO Slab shot always make coins look better. I mean yeah, they hide scratches but its that 'in hand' look, where eye appeal trumps some potential small marks. Nice coin! Not sure where I would have been but probably 64/65 before.
Jb-rarities.com
IG: jb_rarities
There's the good pic, what do I win
Very nice coin. The first pic was blurred and looked like 64 or even AU but showed the luster and the second pic, however terrible showed that the details were in fact sharp. Put those two together and a quick look at Coin facts reveals that even 67's and 8's show what looks like to be rub on liberty's arm etc. when in fact I think it's just color/acceptable.
Regardless, It's time to send in for the upgrade - Still looks 67 to me.
Thanks for sharing!
Very nice. I was leaning 65 because it was difficult to judge the luster from the photographs. Enjoy!
Thanks all, and thanks for the comments, yes it's a keeper, looks better in hand.
).
I get the wags, posted with these sub-par scans, and being it was a GTG, I took a chance on this one. I imagined few would get it right, if any. Hence these are called GTG.
Glad at least one hit it on the nail, and another was at the door but it hit him ( @mannie gray
Happy Holidays!
She's purdy!
Initial guess was 65, indeed the slab shot shows it better. What a beauty!
My YouTube Channel
I think I would've guessed different with the current photo in the slab, minus the grade.
Gorgeous!!
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/