Home U.S. Coin Forum

Liberty Nickel Planchet Error

Steven59Steven59 Posts: 9,077 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited October 24, 2021 10:26AM in U.S. Coin Forum

Even though this is graded MS63 there is a flaw in the crown. Is this a planchet error like a (De) Lamination? Or something else?

"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

Comments

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Appears to be a planchet flaw .... No surrounding damage, original pit in planchet. Cheers, RickO

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would classify this as a defective planchet rather than an error.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,877 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Does the defect show on the reverse?
    If so, it might be a 'blow hole' error.

    And as an aside, a defective planchet would
    be considered an error, imo.

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,325 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FredWeinberg said:
    Does the defect show on the reverse?
    If so, it might be a 'blow hole' error.

    And as an aside, a defective planchet would
    be considered an error, imo.

    Is it not possible to have a "one-sided blow hole"? I mean, the mechanism would be different, but if you had a shallow defect, couldn't it collapse during minting instead of rolling?

  • Steven59Steven59 Posts: 9,077 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FredWeinberg said:
    Does the defect show on the reverse?
    If so, it might be a 'blow hole' error.

    And as an aside, a defective planchet would
    be considered an error, imo.

    I don't see anything on the reverse................

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,877 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If there isn't a 'hole' on the reverse, it's not a 'blow hole'

    This one is a defective planchet.

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • AMRCAMRC Posts: 4,280 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Do you think it has anything to do with "Pluribus" having what looks like some struck-through with grease?

    MLAeBayNumismatics: "The greatest hobby in the world!"
  • Steven59Steven59 Posts: 9,077 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The U is struck normal but the rest of the letters in PLURIBUS are indeed weakly struck - I thought it was just some grease on the die causing that.

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • @FredWeinberg said:
    Does the defect show on the reverse?
    If so, it might be a 'blow hole' error.

    And as an aside, a defective planchet would
    be considered an error, imo.

    I think Fred's spot on. Also, I would imagine they may have missed the error because it is somewhat obscured by the tiara (if that's the correct description) and the letters.

    www.sullivannumismatics.com Dealer in Mint Error Coins.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file