Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

First year IHC, GTG

CryptoCrypto Posts: 4,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited October 3, 2021 6:29AM in U.S. Coin Forum

Something to ponder on the holy day



Comments

  • Options
    gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,899 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll guess 64

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • Options
    HalfDimeDudeHalfDimeDude Posts: 1,206 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Im at 63

    "That's why I wander and follow La Vie Dansante"

  • Options
    hummingbird_coinshummingbird_coins Posts: 1,691 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    scotty4449scotty4449 Posts: 718 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I guess MS63

  • Options
    jedmjedm Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm thinking 62 but a really clean looking one, just missing the luster. Hard to judge by pics alone.

  • Options
    CryptoCrypto Posts: 4,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 3, 2021 7:35AM

    @jedm said:
    I'm thinking 62 but a really clean looking one, just missing the luster. Hard to judge by pics alone.

    It has weak PL flash instead of traditional luster. The Rev has more than the Obv which one would expect.

  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,805 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Honestly? 58. Maybe a commercial 63 but if you own it I’d bet against that

  • Options
    Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 12,201 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I was concerned about the luster as well, but with the additional info, NGC 63. Tough issue to find decent like this.

    Successful BST transactions with 180 members. Gothat3rs, Omegaraptor, breakdown, scotty1419, Cent1225, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Options
    lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 9,574 ✭✭✭✭✭

    ...my first impression was 63 too.

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • Options
    nwcoastnwcoast Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My first thought was 62-63.
    Looks very well struck with a cool hint of PL on the reverse is cool.

    Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 17,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My guess is MS63.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge Posts: 10,019 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62 or 63.

  • Options
    ThreeCentSilverFLThreeCentSilverFL Posts: 1,700 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’ll go 64. Nice, clean, look.

  • Options
    ashelandasheland Posts: 24,544 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    lusterloverlusterlover Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 3, 2021 10:52AM
  • Options
    Picker1954Picker1954 Posts: 190 ✭✭✭
    edited October 3, 2021 10:52AM

    It's an 1859 pattern J-228 or 2 different coins. Marks on obverse and spots---- MS62

  • Options
    CryptoCrypto Posts: 4,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 3, 2021 11:27AM

    Good guesses I told myself I would wait until someone noticed it was a Judd. Commercial 63 for sure. Not the point I was planning on making on this post but @tradedollarnut brings up a decent point about the grade on the holder and it’s effect on the price.

    Example a grade being a benefit to the price or a detriment. A true MS63 can be held back by the grade esp when all the auction histories are for AU63s. As to this coin it is a slightly mishandled UNC with some carbon spotting and the color difference on the Obv fields speaks to a probable dip at some point. But there are always two sides to a point of view. If one was to pay strong money for an AU63 when there is a large spread between an AU58 you could find yourself down a few dollars. But in cases of price compression where most survivors are in the AU low UNC range if you can get a deal the commercial grade helps act as insurance.

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,721 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Late again, but thought it was a 62.... Still do.... Cheers, RickO

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file