Grade this 1928-s buffalo nickel

Here is a 1928-s buffalo nickel that has already been graded/encapsulated. When looking at the front of this coin your eyes
immediately go to the area to the south EAST of the Indian’s chin. How much does all of that black residue affect the grade?
Collector of Buffalo Nickels and other 20th century United States Coinage
a.k.a "The BUFFINATOR"
a.k.a "The BUFFINATOR"
1
Comments
Struck with worn dies on both sides, black maybe grease residue from trying to prolong die life. I'd give it a 64 ?
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"
You mean to the south east of the Indian's chin? I would grade it a 63.
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled
My guess is MS64.
WWTCG??
63-
IMO, if the coin were otherwise nearly perfect, the eye appeal of the grease would limit the grade to 66 or 66+. I wouldn't want a 67 with that. However, since the coin isn't otherwise perfect, the combination of grease and hits with good luster leads me to 65.
I’ve got a lot of learning to do on buffs
63
I swear that Buffalo's eyeball looks different than any I've seen before...
MS65, and while the black stuff is a bit distracting I find my eye is drawn to the hits in the hair as much or more than the black.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
I’ll go with 64 also, and an overall decent example of a 28S.
It’s the Eye from Dr Moreau
I think MS64... the dark spots (I think) might be less of a distraction "in hand"... more of a distraction looking at an image that's been enlarged to that extent...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
Not that familiar with buffs, hoping to get into the series soon. I'll guess MS64+
65
I’m in the 65 camp.
Luster is strong.
Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014
Thanks for pointing out my error, I fixed it .
a.k.a "The BUFFINATOR"
Looks like a 64 to me.... A lot of dings on the obverse... Nice reverse... Cheers, RickO
MS64 would be my guess black spot not in area of importance for grading would surprise me if given MS65 with all the nicks on the obverse but then again the graders take the Reverse into consideration a lot of the time for some reason when giving the grade, Just my opinion.
I'll go with 65
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
I like it as a 65
Collector, occasional seller
65
65
jom
Strike is terrible, with the reverse a little better than the obverse. Worn dies on both sides. Typical late die state branch mint coin. I don't think the black stuff matters.
63
Pete
Here is the slab and to me the grunge near the chin keeps it out of a super grade. Even at the 65 level

it seems inconsistent with that grade
a.k.a "The BUFFINATOR"
It's a very nice coin. The look of the coin is even more appealing in the PCGS slab than your photo. It has a hue to it, right?
I was guessing MS65, maybe even MS66 based on your photo.
No comment.
Pete
Here's the trueview of it, looks MUCH better but I still like it as a 65. I bet it has tons of luster, however.

Nice - could be the eye appeal pushed it up
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"
Yes it is an attractive coin
a.k.a "The BUFFINATOR"
64