Home U.S. Coin Forum

Altered Surfaces yet strangely kind of attractive

braddickbraddick Posts: 24,245 ✭✭✭✭✭

I've been following this half dollar since it was listed on eBay (link below). NGC calls it Altered Surfaces and of course, I agree. I think the coin had not only been whizzed yet perhaps also tooled. What is your opinion as to the problem(s) associated with it?

Now, what I find a bit annoying is I like it. The details, if enhanced look kind of cool and I think it would display well in a typeset of halves (with the problems noted to those looking at it).
https://www.ebay.com/itm/203603263413?_trkparms=amclksrc=ITM&aid=111001&algo=REC.SEED&ao=1&asc=20160908105057&meid=8c8abbaaaa5e4c1fa291b628d7e3695a&pid=100675&rk=12&rkt=15&sd=304142952941&itm=203603263413&pmt=0&noa=1&pg=2380057&_trksid=p2380057.c100675.m4236&_trkparms=pageci:035843f7-15b6-11ec-bdb0-1e7d2cbf8744|parentrq:e6b4a0e917b0ab859ddec8defffff04c|iid:1

peacockcoins

Comments

  • thebeavthebeav Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 14, 2021 5:00PM

    It does have a neat look.
    It's a shame they don't show the NGC label, just to see what it actually says. I think it sells for some pretty good money, you know those civil war dates........

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,245 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It has an impaired proof look about it- especially so on the reverse.

    peacockcoins

  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't think it entirely unattractive.

  • ReadyFireAimReadyFireAim Posts: 1,828 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 14, 2021 5:57PM

    My understanding of Alt-Surf is than it's reversible w/ conservation. (coloring, putty)
    Tooled & whizzed are something damaging to the surface but can be hidden by Alt-Surf.

  • hummingbird_coinshummingbird_coins Posts: 1,239 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I dislike the look but that is just my opinion, beauty is in the eye of the beholder

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 10,997 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @braddick said:
    It has an impaired proof look about it- especially so on the reverse.

    Sure does have that look.

  • fathomfathom Posts: 1,782 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Whizzed, burnished etc. IMO.

    Not worth the effort or funds. Save for a nicer one, they are popular spendy civil war dates but available.

  • AercusAercus Posts: 381 ✭✭✭✭

    Not for me. Looks like it will do well though.

    Aercus Numismatics - Certified coins for sale

  • ElmerFusterpuckElmerFusterpuck Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 17, 2021 5:29AM

    It does have a nice look to it, but it's one I would pass on. 1864 is a date that is very difficult to find raw or slabbed and especially not messed with. It took me years to find one for my set.

  • AMRCAMRC Posts: 4,280 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Why else would anyone want to alter a surface if not to make the coin more appealing? Altered Surfaces are like pretty women and make-up. You are not always sure what is under there. :-)

    MLAeBayNumismatics: "The greatest hobby in the world!"
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not a good buy.... it will always be a problem coin. Cheers, RickO

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file