Home U.S. Coin Forum

If an auction house sells an illegal item, is the buyer made whole?

ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,123 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited July 28, 2021 3:46AM in U.S. Coin Forum

I just read this article which indicates Christie's sold an illegal item to Hobby Lobby for $1.6 million, which now needs to be forfeit so the item can be returned to the original country.

In a case like this, is the buyer out $1.6M? Or is Christie's out $1.6M? Can Christie's get the money back from the seller?

https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/27/politics/epic-of-gilgamesh-hobby-lobby/index.html

Tagged:

Comments

  • TurtleCatTurtleCat Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am not a lawyer but I’m sure the buyer is made whole in these situations.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 34,235 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TurtleCat said:
    I am not a lawyer but I’m sure the buyer is made whole in these situations.

    I'm not so sure. It's 7 years later. The auction house statement did not include reparations. I imagine it would take a lawsuit, likely including the consignor and auction house.

  • ms70ms70 Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't know but I will guess that would result in lawsuits right back over the chain of previous possession as far as it can go.

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • BStrauss3BStrauss3 Posts: 3,418 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The forfeiture is between HL and USG.

    Whether HL has a claim against C would depend on the contract. Whether C was acting as the seller or merely an intermediate and any contract between C and the seller.

    Always read your contract(s). In this case, btw, it was a private sale and not an auction.

    (That C is an auction house is irrelevant, but TOS would apply if you had bought it at auction - they are available on the web, for example for a London sale at https://www.christies.com/media-library/pdf/conditions-of-sale/london-conditions-of-sale.pdf)

    -----Burton
    ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")
  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,261 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BStrauss3 said:
    In this case, btw, it was a private sale and not an auction.

    I would excuse anyone reading the posted link for thinking it was an auction as the article said it was an auction in the opening sentence. :)

  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,794 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 28, 2021 9:58AM

    On something this big, the courts and lawyers will decide. If the involved parties don't come to an agreement, it will take years to sort out. By then the legal fees will probably approach the value of the thing.

  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,689 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 28, 2021 6:10AM

    The game of hot potato typically hammers the holder at discovery (Part of the back story of the recent 1854s no doubt) Recourse typically can only be granted by parties who were knowing participants in fraud. IE you would have to prove the auction house knowingly or should have known that they were dealing in stolen goods or the consignor had a known history of fraud (to them) and they chose fees over integrity. A few houses have been caught up by continually taking wine from bad sources and helping obfuscate the source to encourage bids. I think there is some precedence involving sales or art coming from the holocaust too but those are the exceptions not the rule. Most houses are pretty protected and many an artifact has had to go back to host countries at buyers remorse in the antiquities field.

    That said if you are a good customer, sometimes, I am sure they will settle if the future prospects of your business outweighs the loss all while pointing a spot light back at the consignor who will also have some splainin to do

  • TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It should be the Auction house's loss

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,150 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The question is well above my pay grade.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,345 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There are likely to be some very wealthy lawyers.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,656 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Reading the article it looks like Christie's tried to hide information.
    Now it can go back to Iraq and be destroyed by radicals.

    thefinn
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The legal complexities involved will certainly enrich some law firms. I would really be interested to see what is eventually resolved. Too bad about the fate of the piece, I would guess it will either vanish with no explanations, or, instead of being destroyed, sold on the black market to begin another journey. Cheers, RickO

  • CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,629 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As a matter of practice I suspect the bidder is made whole. To do otherwise would be really bad PR for the auction house.

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,123 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 29, 2021 5:54AM

    When buying real estate, Title Insurance is available.

    Is there such a thing for collectibles? And if so, would it cover something like this?

  • LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,384 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I bought a coin once that was sold illegally, at auction - I was made whole - but can't tell you how - nondisclosure agreement.

    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose.
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,106 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just some quick thoughts...

    First, the choice of law will be important.

    It is possible that as part of the consignment contract, the consignor agreed to defend and indemnify the auction house in connection with the items consigned. That may not shift the entire exposure to the consignor based upon the consignor's reasonable expectations as to the potential legal issues surrounding the actual sale of the consigned item and his expectation that the auction house should be well versed in this area.

    The real question will likely be the law itself... when the law was passed... and how that fits into the timetable of the auction and ultimate sale/purchase.

    The reasonable expectations and level of sophistication on the part of successful bidder could come into play.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file