Ha, no, they just missed the decimal point before the 3 in that grade.
Nic
Guides Authored - Graded Card Scanning Guide PDF | History of the PSA Label PDF
Holy crap!!! That has to be a mechanical error.
Yes, that is a mech error. Mech errors on the grading portion of the label occur shockingly frequently. There are many documented examples of that specific area of mech error throughout the message boards here.
mechanical and or human error; that's still a cool looking card!
In the words of Probstein - "Looks Nicer!!!"
Either a mechanical error or a counterfeit slab.
I'm taking a different route....PWCC HE
@NGS428 said: Ha, no, they just missed the decimal point before the 3 in that grade.
And quite possibly a zero or two after the decimal point and before the 3.
Take it with pride! They did you a favor. Should have been upcharged! 😂
This card is still a 3 in the database? Wow.
id need to see the back to make a proper assessment. 😂
Speaking of possible mechanical error. What about this one? I think they forgot to add the (OC) qualifier.
Comments
Ha, no, they just missed the decimal point before the 3 in that grade.
Nic
Guides Authored - Graded Card Scanning Guide PDF | History of the PSA Label PDF
Holy crap!!! That has to be a mechanical error.
Yes, that is a mech error. Mech errors on the grading portion of the label occur shockingly frequently. There are many documented examples of that specific area of mech error throughout the message boards here.
mechanical and or human error; that's still a cool looking card!
In the words of Probstein - "Looks Nicer!!!"
Either a mechanical error or a counterfeit slab.
I'm taking a different route....PWCC HE
And quite possibly a zero or two after the decimal point and before the 3.
Take it with pride! They did you a favor. Should have been upcharged! 😂
This card is still a 3 in the database? Wow.
id need to see the back to make a proper assessment. 😂
Speaking of possible mechanical error. What about this one? I think they forgot to add the (OC) qualifier.