What does "Previously loaded" mean regarding The Set Registry?????

Never mind,,,,,,,,,, I figured it out,,,,,,,,,
I was trying to add a NON-CAC coin to my CAC only Registry Set.
It went into my NON-CAC Registry Set OK.
All I have to do now is send it to NJ for a little green bean,,,,, guaranteed a BEAN,,,,
Yeah right,,,,,,, bet you never heard that before,,,,,
We will know shortly,,,,,,,,
It has a heck of a strike,,,,,,, very few marks,,,,,,, nice original surfaces,,,,,,,,
That is a die crack running thru the neck,,,,, my current MS65 coin has the exact same crack,,,,, not a scratch.
Another die crack on the reverse running thru United States.
Since CAC doesn't consider a + grade I don't see how it can not CAC.
It is clearly a superior coin to the MS65 CAC Coin currently in my set.
Here it is,,,,,, what do you all think? Bean or no Bean?
MS65+
Here is my current MS65 CAC Coin,,,,, the strike pales in comparison to the MS65+ Coin.
—————————————————————
Update:
I heard back from PCGS and “Previously loaded” means that coin number is already part of the registry set in question.

Comments
IFRC it means that the Cert Number is in another registry set and cannot be used again.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
No, it meant it was a Non-CAC Coin trying to go into my CAC Registry Set. A cert number can go into a hundred different sets (of the same owner) if it fits the composite,,,, this NON-CAC Coin didn't fit the composite for a CAC only set. I wasn't considering that when I tried to add it to my CAC Set.
And what does "IFRA" mean?
@GRANDAM "my current MS65 coin has the exact same crack,,,,, not a scratch."
Yep, that's a die crack.
Not that it matters much but if you look closely you will see they are not the same.
Good chance you could find the Vam for each of the 2 coins.
It should have been IIRC, "if I remember correctly". I have received a similar message when I tried to put a coin in another registry set, perhaps a fluke?
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
I have received a similar message when I tried to put a coin in another registry set, perhaps a fluke?
IDK but in my case I was just trying to put it in the wrong set.
Actually I believe that the MS65+ coin is VAM-10A.
Any premium attached to the Vam to make it worth the cost of having it labeled as such?
PCGS does not attribute VAM-10A.
Die Varieties
1922-D $1 VAM 1
1922-D $1 VAM 1M Obv Die CUD
1922-D $1 VAM 2
1922-D $1 V-2A Retained Die Break
1922-D $1 VAM 3 Doubled Leaves
1922-D $1 VAM 4 Doubled Motto
1922-D $1 VAM 5
1922-D $1 VAM 6
1922-D $1 VAM 7 Tripled Reverse
1922-D $1 V-14A Retained Die Break
https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin/1922-d-1/7358
ANACS would attribute it. Not sure about ATS.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
I don't really care about the VAM unless their is a premium attached to it. The seller had a sticker on it labeling it as VAM 10-A Finest known..
I would not place any additional value if our host will not attribute it.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
Sounds reasonable to me,,,,,, besides if it is labeled as a VAM it might not fit into my set.
Don't want to take a chance on that.
Off to CAC it goes.
No opinions on wether the MS65+ coin will sticker?
I need a Peace Dollar expert,,,,,, where is @BryceM
Nice looking Peace Dollar... I am not a CAC expert, so take my opinion as just that - an opinion. I think it is borderline for a bean.... the hit on the forehead and ding in the hair on the obverse and sun ray hits and eagle leg on the reverse, make me think it might not. Hope I am wrong.... Good luck, Cheers, RickO
Good luck. If you get a bean, I say congrats. My track record with CAC & Peace dollars has been inconsistent and often frustrating.
In the OP, you stated that due to the +, you "don't see how it wouldn't CAC". Believe me, there are ways!
That is not what I said,,,, I said the + coin is clearly superior to the MS65 coin and since the + doesn’t require tougher standards I think the + coin should sticker,,,,, at least that is what I meant.
Arright, the coin looks really clean, the die break is cool, and strike is excellent. That said, it might be lacking a bit in luster, and that could hurt its chances at CAC, assuming it hasn't been tried previously.
I would buy it as a 65, but not as a 66 due to the apparent luster, which is tough to evaluate in a photo. I see no reason it shouldn't sticker, but I will tell you from personal experience, I've had numerous + coins that CAC wouldn't sticker. I will also tell you that JA and I just see Peace dollars differently. I've seen numerous CAC coins I thought were overgraded, and other gorgeous coins he didn't like.
Between the two coins you posted, I think the second one probably is flashier and has a little better eye appeal. Strike is clearly better on the first coin, but that's only 10% of the grade. The first coin is a little cleaner in the fields, but the cheek and eagle on the second coin are oh-so-nice.
Well, I paid $400 less than PCGS PRCE Guide Price so I am good there. The coin will be on its way to CAC shortly so we will find out soon,
If it stickers great! If not I still like it. If f it does sticker I will sell the MS65 coin.