New Morgan-Grade Opinion
al410
Posts: 2,402 ✭✭✭✭
5
al410
Posts: 2,402 ✭✭✭✭
al410
Posts: 2,402 ✭✭✭✭
Comments
Nice Morgan!!
63
Mr_Spud
63
63
Nice one ... 63
Great luster - just to be different, 63+
In your collection, it’s a 63. In mine, it’s a 64
64.
"It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
63
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Could 64
I think it's clean enough to be a 64
64 congrats
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
63+/64
Liner
I will be different. 62
2
the forum will chip in to have it graded for us.
You MS62 guys might only be a point off, instead of two. But even if you are, that would be a giant point. As pictured, the coin shouldn’t grade that low.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
63
Decent strike, good luster but a few too many hits, though light. MS63 and maybe 64 if the luster carries the day.
Louis Armstrong
My feelings when I purchased were 63, having said that I have seen many 64's that did not come up to this coin.
Thanks for the input
Al
Old school 63 but might 64, in today's world.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
64
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
Exactly how I felt when I first saw it.
Click on this link to see my ebay listings.
I'm going with 63 based on the graded Morgans in my collection.
63 is what it should be, IMO.
TurtleCat Gold Dollars
Looks like a 63, but it seems to have booming luster so it may get bumped to a 64.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
63
I would agree with 63...the chatter on the cheek, neck and fields really holds the grade down. Cheers, RickO
Picture is the size of a plate of course the hits show exaggerated. I go 64 and have seen 65’s I didn’t agree with take pictures like that.
I am in the 64 boat
Collector, occasional seller
64 here
My YouTube Channel
62
imho - in the minority it seems, too much surface chatter and dings for me.
fwiw, and besides, had I personally sent this in to our hosts I bet I would get a 62 or so I imagine, and so has past personal history proven, so I am not so giving here.
I still think 63... there's cheek chatter and the dark spot on the reverse that hold it back... IMHO...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
very solid 64 - marks are more like scuffs and none are deep. That's true "A" quality lustre and frost
edited to add: the reverse spot is of minimal distraction obscured in the detail of the wreath. It would be much worse in the field.
Will this thread get a bean?
MS64, yet I've seen photos where the camera and lighting pick-up scuffs look like this on an MS65.
peacockcoins
I agree wit the 63s.
64
63
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
63 seems about right to me.
63
In with the 3 crowd, I did debate with myself about 64