Home U.S. Coin Forum

SLQ design variety question

rmpsrpmsrmpsrpms Posts: 1,968 ✭✭✭✭✭

Over on another forum there was some controversy regarding a 1917 SLQ being FH or not, and whether an auction listing showed the actual coin or something else. I made an animated gif of the two heads in question, and saw a surprising difference in the design between the two. There is an obvious difference in the spacing between the "cowlicks" at back of head. The "forelocks" are also a bit different, and there may be other differences as well. Is this a known design difference? See the comparison gif below:

PM me for coin photography equipment, or visit my website:

http://macrocoins.com

Comments

  • clarkbar04clarkbar04 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've known about it but I don't know how "well known" it is. The main giveaway to me is the one type the nose is way more "roman".

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,699 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Never noticed it.

    Might be a touch up on a working die.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have noticed that, however, not being a collector of the series, thought it was due to die work. Your GIF shows the differences quite well. Cheers, RickO

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file