i kn ow that 1987,88,89 there are very few errors found so if it was a unknown error id send it in,,,but if its not ddo then i didnt want to waste time on it.
If yes, does yours match exactly the photos of known exampies?
If no, then why scrutinize It?
To be fair, if there is a known DD, there was a time when it wasn't known.
1) I'm trying to make a point, that new collectors in particular should use existing knowkedge and resources to focus their efforts.
2) if the coin was current (this year or last year, for example) then there may be a discovery to be made by anyone who is looking, but for the most part older DDs would already have been identified.
P.S.: a sign of MD is flat and shelf-like doubling.
Zoee
Posts: 90 ✭
Comments
I think MD.
Is there a known DD for this date/mm?
If yes, does yours match exactly the photos of known exampies?
If no, then why scrutinize It?
I LOOKED IN MY BOOKS AND WASTCHED A FEW VIDIOS ON U TUBE COULDNT FIND ANYTHING SO I THOUGHT ID ASKJ YOU GUYS
.
To be fair, if there is a known DD, there was a time when it wasn't known.
sorry about spelling in a hurry have to go in a minute.
i kn ow that 1987,88,89 there are very few errors found so if it was a unknown error id send it in,,,but if its not ddo then i didnt want to waste time on it.
I'd vote machine doubling. Study photos of true doubled dies and you'll learn to spot the difference.
No, not a ddo
1) I'm trying to make a point, that new collectors in particular should use existing knowkedge and resources to focus their efforts.
2) if the coin was current (this year or last year, for example) then there may be a discovery to be made by anyone who is looking, but for the most part older DDs would already have been identified.
P.S.: a sign of MD is flat and shelf-like doubling.
Classic machine doubling. To see many examples of true doubled dies go here-http://www.varietyvista.com/
Definitely machine doubling.... Good picture.... Cheers, RickO